Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233042›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Oceanographic setting influences the prokaryotic community and metabolome in deep-sea sponges.

Karin Steffen, Anak Agung Gede Indraningrat, Ida Erngren, Jakob Haglöf, Leontine E Becking, Hauke Smidt, Igor Yashayaev, Ellen Kenchington, Curt Pettersson, Paco Cárdenas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiome changes in the spongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Karin Steffen *Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anak Agung Gede Indraningrat *Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Warmadewa University, Jln Terompong 24, Denpasar, Bali, 80239, Indonesia.
Ida ErngrenAnalytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jakob HaglöfAnalytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Leontine E BeckingAquaculture & Fisheries, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Igor YashayaevDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, B2Y 4A2, Canada.
Ellen KenchingtonDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, B2Y 4A2, Canada.
Curt PetterssonAnalytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Paco Cárdenas *Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden. paco.cardenas@farmbio.uu.se.
Detmer Sipkema *Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Uppsala University · SEWageningen University & Research · NLBedford Institute of Oceanography · CAFisheries and Oceans Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine sponges (phylum Porifera) are leading organisms for the discovery of bioactive compounds from nature. Their often rich and species-specific microbiota is hypothesised to be producing many of these compounds. Yet, environmental influences on the sponge-associated microbiota and bioactive compound production remain elusive. Here, we investigated the changes of microbiota and metabolomes in sponges along a depth range of 1232 m. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and untargeted metabolomics, we assessed prokaryotic and chemical diversities in three deep-sea sponge species: Geodia barretti, Stryphnus fortis, and Weberella bursa. Both prokaryotic communities and metabolome varied significantly with depth, which we hypothesized to be the effect of different water masses. Up to 35.5% of microbial ASVs (amplicon sequence variants) showed significant changes with depth while phylum-level composition of host microbiome remained unchanged. The metabolome varied with depth, with relative quantities of known bioactive compounds increasing or decreasing strongly. Other metabolites varying with depth were compatible solutes regulating osmolarity of the cells. Correlations between prokaryotic community and the bioactive compounds in G. barretti suggested members of Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, or an unclassified prokaryote as potential producers.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPoriferaAnimalsMetabolomePhylogenyProkaryotic CellsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35233042
PMCPMC8888554
OpenAlexW4214760834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.