Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233038›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of obesity (2005)2022

The Universal Eating Monitor (UEM): objective assessment of food intake behavior in the laboratory setting.

Harry R Kissileff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of obesity (2005), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT07457424. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07457424 active not recruiting

Direct Measurement of Changes in Food Selection and Intake Behaviour After Using the Maximum Dose of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Ran2022Enrolled140Registered outcomes29Posted comparisons0ConditionsMetabolic Disease, Obesity & OverweightArmssemaglutide 1 mg weekly injection
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harry R KissileffMount Sinai Morningside Hospital and Department of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine, 1111 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY, 10025, USA. harry.kissileff2@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-5641
Mount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Universal Eating Monitor was a term used to describe a device used in a laboratory setting that enabled investigators to measure, with the same instrument, the rate of eating either solids or liquids, hence the term "universal". It consisted of an electronic balance placed in a false panel under a table cloth on which could be placed a food reservoir that contained either solid or liquefied food. The device was created in order to determine whether rates of eating differed in pattern between solid and liquid foods. An acceptable mixture of foods of identical composition that could be served as either solid or blended as a liquid was used to test the hypothesis that eating rate and intake were affected by physical composition. A best-fitting mathematical function (intake was quadratic function of time, with coefficients varying among foods used and experimental conditions), quantified intake rates. The device was used to test a variety of mechanisms underlying food intake control. Eating rates were linear when solid foods were used, but negatively accelerated with liquids. Overall, intake did not differ between solid and liquefied food of identical composition. Satiation on a calorie for calorie basis was different among foods, but physical composition interacted with energy density. Hormones and gastric distension were strong influences on food intake and rate of eating. Individuals with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder ate more than individuals without these disturbances. Intake in social and individual contexts was identical, but the rate of eating was slower when two individuals dined together. The eating monitor has been a useful instrument for elucidating controls of food intake and describing eating pathology.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSatiationEatingEnergy IntakeFoodHumans

Identifiers

PMID35233038
PMCPMC9151389
OpenAlexW4214831914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.