ArticleScientific reports2022
The effect of a variable focal spot size on the contrast channels retrieved in edge-illumination X-ray phase contrast imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Edge-Illumination X-Ray Dark-Field Tomography.Physical review applied · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Neural Network Performance on NDT Digital X-ray Radiography Images: Analyzing the Impact of Image Quality Parameters-An Experimental Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-modal X-ray imaging allows the extraction of phase and dark-field (or "Ultra-small Angle Scatter") images alongside conventional attenuation ones. Recently, scan-based systems using conventional sources that can simultaneously output the above three images on relatively large-size objects have been developed by various groups. One limitation is the need for some degree of spatial coherence, achieved either through the use of microfocal sources, or by placing an absorption grating in front of an extended source. Both these solutions limit the amount of flux available for imaging, with the latter also leading to a more complex setup with additional alignment requirements. Edge-illumination partly overcomes this as it was proven to work with focal spots of up to 100 micron. While high-flux, 100 micron focal spot sources do exist, their comparatively large footprint and high cost can be obstacles to widespread translation. A simple solution consists in placing a single slit in front of a large focal spot source. We used a tunable slit to study the system performance at various effective focal spot sizes, by extracting transmission, phase and dark-field images of the same specimens for a range of slit widths. We show that consistent, repeatable results are obtained for varying X-ray statistics and effective focal spot sizes. As the slit width is increased, the expected reduction in the raw differential phase peaks is observed, compensated for in the retrieval process by a broadened sensitivity function. This leads to the same values being correctly retrieved, but with a slightly larger error bar i.e. a reduction in phase sensitivity. Concurrently, a slight increase in the dark-field signal is also observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.