Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232812›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Impact of the DREAMS Partnership on social support and general self-efficacy among adolescent girls and young women: causal analysis of population-based cohorts in Kenya and South Africa.

Annabelle Gourlay, Sian Floyd, Faith Magut, Sarah Mulwa, Nondumiso Mthiyane, Elvis Wambiya, Moses Otieno, Vivienne Kamire, Jane Osindo, Natsayi Chimbindi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Annabelle GourlayFaculty of Epidemiology of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK annabelle.gourlay@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4387-1925
Sian FloydFaculty of Epidemiology of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-7601
Faith MagutCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Sarah MulwaFaculty of Epidemiology of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nondumiso MthiyaneInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Elvis WambiyaHealth and Systems for Health, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Moses OtienoCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Vivienne KamireCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jane OsindoHealth and Systems for Health, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Natsayi ChimbindiInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Abdhalah ZirabaHealth and Systems for Health, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel KwaroCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Maryam ShahmaneshInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-8535
Isolde BirdthistleFaculty of Epidemiology of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-6588
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAfrica Health Research Institute · ZAAfrican Population and Health Research Center · KE

Funding

Maximizing combination HIV prevention, uptake and retention by adolescent girls and young womenR01MH114560 · NIMH · KWAZULU-NATAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE TB-HIV · PI SHAHMANESH, MARYAM · 2017 to 2023
$2.0M
Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114560Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe (DREAMS) Partnership aimed to influence psychosocial processes that promote empowerment among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and reduce HIV incidence. We estimated the impact of DREAMS on aspects of AGYW's collective and individual agency (specifically, social support and self-efficacy), in three settings where DREAMS was implemented from 2016 until at least end 2018.

methodsResearch cohorts of ~1500 AGYW aged 13-22 were randomly selected from demographic platforms in Kenya (Nairobi; Gem) and South Africa (uMkhanyakude) and followed up from 2017 to 2019. Social support was based on questions about female networks and access to safe places to meet with peers; general self-efficacy was measured using a scale previously validated in other settings. We conducted multivariable logistic regression, and estimated the causal effect of invitation to DREAMS on each outcome in 2018 and 2019 by comparing counter-factual scenarios in which all, vs no, AGYW were DREAMS invitees.

resultsIn Nairobi, Gem and uMkhanyakude, respectively, 74%, 57% and 53% were invited to DREAMS by 2018. Social support was higher among DREAMS invitees versus non-invitees (eg, adjusted OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.6), Gem, 2018). In 2018, DREAMS increased social support in all settings and age groups, for example, from 28% if none were DREAMS invitees to 43% if all were invitees (+15% (95% CI 10% to 20%)) in Gem. Effects were strongest in Kenya, but weakened in 2019, particularly among older AGYW. In uMkhanyakude, DREAMS invitees had greater self-efficacy compared with non-invitees in 2018 (+9% (95% CI 3% to 13%), 2018) but less so in 2019. In Kenyan settings, there was weak evidence for impact on self-efficacy among younger AGYW in Gem (+6% (95% CI 0% to 13%)) and older AGYW in Nairobi (+9% (95% CI -3% to +20%)) in 2019.

conclusionsDREAMS impacted on social support and, less consistently, on self-efficacy. Weakening effects over time may reflect changes in access to safe spaces and social networks as AGYW age and change circumstances, and withdrawal of DREAMS from uMkhanyakude in 2018, highlighting the importance of programme sustainability and improving programming for older participants.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual BehaviorAdolescentFemaleHumansKenyaSelf EfficacySocial SupportSouth AfricaYoung Adultcohort studyepidemiologyhealth systems evaluationHIVprevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID35232812
PMCPMC8889325
OpenAlexW4214664233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.