Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232792›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Primary care for people with severe mental illness and comorbid obstructive airways disease: a qualitative study of patient perspectives with integrated stakeholder feedback.

Caroline Mitchell, Nicholas Zuraw, Brigitte Delaney, Helen Twohig, Neil Dolan, Elizabeth Walton, Joe Hulin, Camelia Yousefpour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. COPD and Schizophrenia.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline MitchellAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK c.mitchell@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4790-0095
Nicholas ZurawAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Brigitte DelaneyAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Helen TwohigInstitute for Primary Health Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Neil DolanAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Elizabeth WaltonAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Joe HulinMental Health, Research Unit, Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Camelia YousefpourAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK.
University of Sheffield · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patient and stakeholder perspectives on primary respiratory care for people with severe mental illness (SMI) and comorbid obstructive airways disease (OAD).

designQualitative, semistructured qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of people with a diagnosis of SMI (bipolar illness, schizophrenia, affective disorder with psychosis) and comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Transcribed data were analysed using an interpretive phenomenological approach. Study results were discussed with stakeholders.

settingEight UK general practices.

participants16 people aged 45-75 years, with SMI and comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were interviewed. Twenty-one people, four with lived experience of SMI and seventeen health/social care/third sector practitioners, participated in discussion groups at a stakeholder event.

resultsParticipants described disability and isolation arising from the interplay of SMI and OAD symptoms. Social support determined ease of access to primary care. Self-management of respiratory health was not person-centred as practitioners failed to consider individual needs and health literacy. Participants perceived smoking cessation impossible without tailored support. Less than half of the practices facilitated personalised access to timely primary care and continuity. Overall, there was a reliance on urgent care if service adaptations and social support were lacking. The stakeholder group expressed concern about gaps in care, the short-term funding of community organisations and fear of loss of benefits. Potential solutions focused on supported navigation of care pathways, relational continuity, individual and community asset building and the evolving social prescriber role.

conclusionThis study suggests that despite UK guidelines and incentives to optimise physical healthcare, primary care fails to consistently deliver integrated biopsychosocial care for patients with SMI and OAD. Collaborative, personalised care that builds social capital and tailors support for self-management is needed, alongside service-level interventions to enhance access to healthcare for patients with comorbid SMI and OAD.

Indexed as

AsthmaMental DisordersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveFeedbackHumansPrimary Health Careasthmachronic airways diseasemental healthprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35232792
PMCPMC8889318
OpenAlexW4214769146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.