Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232763›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

A

Swati Trisal, Marcia Aranha, Ankita Chodankar, K VijayRaghavan, Mani Ramaswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Swati TrisalNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1108-2801
Marcia AranhaTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Genetics and Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Ankita ChodankarNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.
K VijayRaghavanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.
Mani RamaswamiNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India mani.ramaswami@tcd.ie.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habituated animals retain a latent capacity for robust engagement with familiar stimuli. In most instances, the ability to override habituation is best explained by postulating that habituation arises from the potentiation of inhibitory inputs onto stimulus-encoding assemblies and that habituation override occurs through disinhibition. Previous work has shown that inhibitory plasticity contributes to specific forms of olfactory and gustatory habituation in

Indexed as

DrosophilaHabituation, PsychophysiologicAnimalsFemaleGABAergic NeuronsSensory Receptor CellsSucroseTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseSucroseTyrosine 3-Monooxygenaseattentiondishabituationdopaminegustatory receptornoveltyproboscis extension reflex

Identifiers

PMID35232763
PMCPMC8985855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.