Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232629›Full record

ArticleBiologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization2022

A gaps-and-needs analysis of vaccine R&D in Europe: Recommendations to improve the research infrastructure.

Stefan Jungbluth, Hilde Depraetere, Monika Slezak, Dennis Christensen, Norbert Stockhofe, Laurent Beloeil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefan JungbluthEuropean Vaccine Initiative (EVI), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.jungbluth@euvaccine.eu.
Hilde DepraetereEuropean Vaccine Initiative (EVI), Heidelberg, Germany.
Monika SlezakEuropean Vaccine Initiative (EVI), Heidelberg, Germany.
Dennis ChristensenStatens Serum Institut, Dept. Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Norbert StockhofeWageningen University/Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Laurent BeloeilBIOASTER Technology Research Institute, Lyon, France.
Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative · DEBIOASTER · FRStatens Serum Institut · DKWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus the importance of strategies supporting vaccine development. During the pandemic, TRANSVAC, the European vaccine-research-infrastructure initiative, undertook an in-depth consultation of stakeholders to identify how best to position and sustain a European vaccine R&D infrastructure. The consultation included an online survey incorporating a gaps-and-needs analysis, follow-up interviews and focus-group meetings. Between October 2020 and June 2021, 53 organisations completed the online survey, including 24 research institutes and universities, and 9 pharmaceutical companies; 24 organisations participated in interviews, and 14 in focus-group meetings. The arising recommendations covered all aspects of the vaccine-development value chain: from preclinical development to financing and business development; and covered prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines, for both human and veterinary indications. Overall, the recommendations supported the expansion and elaboration of services including training programmes, and improved or more extensive access to expertise, technologies, partnerships, curated databases, and-data analysis tools. Funding and financing featured as critical elements requiring support throughout the vaccine-development programmes, notably for academics and small companies, and for vaccine programmes that address medical and veterinary needs without a great potential for commercial gain. Centralizing the access to these research infrastructures via a single on-line portal was considered advantageous.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCOVID-19VaccinesEuropeHumansPandemicsVaccinesManufacturingPlatform technologiesResearch and developmentResearch infrastructureScience policyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35232629
PMCPMC8881975
OpenAlexW4214708566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.