ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2022
Fostering a diverse regional community of physician-scientist trainees.
Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a symposium model for building physician-scientist skills, connections, and persistence.JCI insight · 2025Article
- How to diversify the dwindling physician-scientist workforce after the US affirmative action ban.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Sociodemographic factors and research experience impact MD-PhD program acceptance.JCI insight · 2024Review
- Making the match and breaking it: values, perceptions, and obstacles of trainees applying into physician-scientist training programs.BMC medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among the many academic challenges faced by dual-degree MD-PhD students is access to professional support networks designed to overcome the unique academic and personal barriers to physician-scientist training. In the current study, we hypothesized that regional access to a student MD-PhD conference, termed the Southeastern Medical Scientist Symposium (SEMSS), would enhance medical and/or graduate training by fostering such relationships between physician-scientist trainees, doing so by discussing both the challenges of physician-scientist training and effective strategies to overcome them. In the current study, we used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the overall usefulness of SEMSS over a ten-year period (2010-2020) to identify key areas of particular benefit to trainees. The authors used conference registration data to compile self-reported demographic and regional attendance, followed by a post-conference survey to gauge attendee satisfaction. Over the reporting period, SEMSS was attended by equivalent proportions of MD-PhD and undergraduate students, among which were a high-percentage of students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups relative to the national MD-PhD applicant pool; nearly one-third of URM students attendees later matriculated into MD-PhD programs, far exceeding the national MD-PhD matriculation rate. Among the benefits reported by students were "opportunities to network with peers" and opportunities to learn about the physician-scientist career track. Therefore, we therefore propose regional MD-PhD conferences as an effective model to promote diversity within the physician-scientist training pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.