Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232588›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2022

Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone compared to systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

William A Zammarrelli, Michelle Greenman, Eric Rios-Doria, Katie Miller, Vance Broach, Jennifer J Mueller, Emeline Aviki, Kaled M Alektiar, Robert A Soslow, Lora H Ellenson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sentinel lymph node distribution in endometrial cancer: clinical patterns and implications from a 292-patient cohort.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William A ZammarrelliDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Michelle GreenmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Eric Rios-DoriaDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Katie MillerDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Vance BroachDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Jennifer J MuellerDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Emeline AvikiDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kaled M AlektiarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Robert A SoslowDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Lora H EllensonDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Vicky MakkerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Mario M LeitaoDepartment of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: leitaom@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USNorth Shore University Hospital · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess survival among patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma (CS) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy alone vs. systematic lymph node dissection (LND).

methodsWe identified newly diagnosed CS patients who underwent primary surgical management from January 1996-December 2019. The SLN cohort underwent SLN biopsy alone with bilateral SLNs identified. The systematic LND cohort did not undergo SLN biopsy.

resultsNinety-nine patients underwent SLN biopsy, and 100 patients underwent systematic LND. There was no difference by age, stage, body mass index, myoinvasion (<50%, ≥50%), lymphovascular space invasion, or positive washings. Eighty-five SLN (85.9%) and 15 LND (15%) underwent minimally invasive surgery (P < 0.001). The median total node count was four (range, 1-13) for SLN and 19 (range, 2-50) for LND (P < 0.001). Nodal metastasis occurred in 23 (23.2%) SLN and in 22 (22%) LND (P = 0.4). Postoperative therapy was administered to 85 (85.9%) SLN and 71 (71%) LND (P = 0.02). Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 1-205) for SLN and 55.3 months (range, 1-269) for LND (P = 0.001). The three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 62.9% (SE 5.2%) for SLN and 52.3% (SE 5.3%) for LND (P = 0.13). The three-year overall survival (OS) was 72.1% (SE 5.1%) for SLN and 71.6% (SE 4.6%) for LND (P = 0.68). An isolated nodal recurrence occurred in two (2%) SLN and four (4%) LND (P = 0.26).

conclusionsThere is no difference in PFS or OS among CS patients who undergo SLN biopsy vs. systematic LND. SLN biopsy detects nodal metastasis without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

CarcinosarcomaSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMedical OncologyProgression-Free SurvivalTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor betaSentinel lymph node biopsySystematic lymphadenectomyUterine carcinosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID35232588
PMCPMC9064992
OpenAlexW4214588473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.