Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232496›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2022

Regulatory requirements and labeling of commercially available prescription (oral) medicines in Sri Lanka: there is room for improvement.

Manori Jayasinghe, Thotawaththage Loshadhi Indunika Srilal, Deweni Guruge Pathmila Prasadi, Wickramasinghe Senanayakege Sachini Madushika, Samanda Marakkala Dileka Udyani Silva, Sewwandi Subasinghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manori JayasingheDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka. manorijayasinghe@ahs.ruh.ac.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-0701
Thotawaththage Loshadhi Indunika SrilalDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Deweni Guruge Pathmila PrasadiDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Wickramasinghe Senanayakege Sachini MadushikaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Samanda Marakkala Dileka Udyani SilvaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Sewwandi SubasingheDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consistency and the quality of medicine labels are sought through the regulatory frameworks. This study aims at investigating the secondary labels of medicines based on the labeling regulations and guidelines issued by the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA), Sri Lanka.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 commonly used prescription-only oral medicines selected using the price regulations published for most commonly used drugs. High-resolution images of 216 brands/branded generics/generic products' secondary labels were collected in April 2021 from six community pharmacies in six districts chosen as a convenience sample. Each label was manually assessed using a checklist prepared based on the regulatory requirements by four trained investigators. The status of registration of each product was assessed using the NMRA website. Descriptive statistics were performed.

resultsThere was a variation observed in labeling regulations and information present on packages. Among the 216 products evaluated, only 148 (68%) products appeared as registered medicines on the NMRA website, and 2.3% of medicines fulfilled all stipulated labeling parameters set out by the NMRA, 3% of products abided by the general labeling requirements, and 76% of the products complied with labeling requirements for API. Major deficiencies were observed in the presentation of registration numbers and the details of the local agent, which were unaccounted for in 210 (97%) and 131 (61%) products, respectively. The highest consistency (100%) of information was noted with the dosage form, date of manufacture, date of expiry, and batch numbers. Among the restricted information, attractive pictures (2%), web addresses (6%), and over-stickers (34%) were found.

conclusionsThe results highlighted a gap between regulatory requirements and practice in medicine labeling information. Regular post-market examination of medicinal labels is highly advised in a country that relies largely on imports. Similarly, careful adherence to the labeling regulations is required. Furthermore, suppliers and local agents should be held accountable for ensuring accurate medicine labeling through increased awareness, education, and sanctions.

Indexed as

Labeling of drugsMedication errorsMedicine label informationMedicine packagingNational Medicines Regulatory AuthorityNMRAPolicyRegulationsSafe use of medicines

Identifiers

PMID35232496
PMCPMC8886935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.