Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232470›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2022

30-minute CMR for common clinical indications: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance white paper.

Subha V Raman, Michael Markl, Amit R Patel, Jennifer Bryant, Bradley D Allen, Sven Plein, Nicole Seiberlich

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations toward environmentally sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Competency based curriculum for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A position statement of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Motion Mitigation Techniques for Abdominal and Cardiac MR Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Subha V RamanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Krannert CV Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. suraman@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-0428
Michael MarklDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amit R PatelSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer BryantDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Bradley D AllenDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sven PleinMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre and Biomedical Imaging Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nicole SeiberlichDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/16/2/32089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite decades of accruing evidence supporting the clinical utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), adoption of CMR in routine cardiovascular practice remains limited in many regions of the world. Persistent use of long scan times of 60 min or more contributes to limited adoption, though techniques available on most scanners afford routine CMR examination within 30 min. Incorporating such techniques into standardize protocols can answer common clinical questions in daily practice, including those related to heart failure, cardiomyopathy, ventricular arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, and non-ischemic myocardial injury. BODY: In this white paper, we describe CMR protocols of 30 min or shorter duration with routine techniques with or without stress perfusion, plus specific approaches in patient and scanner room preparation for efficiency. Minimum requirements for the scanner gradient system, coil hardware and pulse sequences are detailed. Recent advances such as quantitative myocardial mapping and other add-on acquisitions can be incorporated into the proposed protocols without significant extension of scan duration for most patients.

conclusionCommon questions in clinical cardiovascular practice can be answered in routine CMR protocols under 30 min; their incorporation warrants consideration to facilitate increased access to CMR worldwide.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of TestsCardiomyopathyCardiovascular magnetic resonanceClinical practiceIschemic heart diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingMyocarditisVentricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID35232470
PMCPMC8886348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.