Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232452›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Assessing patient safety culture in 15 intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.

Mohamed Ayoub Tlili, Wiem Aouicha, Jihene Sahli, Asma Ben Cheikh, Ali Mtiraoui, Thouraya Ajmi, Chekib Zedini, Souad Chelbi, Mohamed Ben Rejeb, Manel Mallouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed Ayoub TliliFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia. medtlili@hotmail.fr.
Wiem AouichaFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Jihene SahliFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Asma Ben CheikhFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Ali MtiraouiFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Thouraya AjmiFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Chekib ZediniFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Souad ChelbiFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Mohamed Ben RejebFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Manel MallouliFaculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin hospitals, intensive care units (ICUs) are particularly high-risk areas for medical errors and adverse events that could occur due to the complexity of care and the patients' fragile medical conditions. Assessing patient safety culture (PSC) is essential to have a broad view on patient safety issues, to orientate future improvement actions and optimize quality of care and patient safety outcomes. This study aimed at assessing PSC in 15 Tunisian ICUs using mixed methods approach.

methodsA cross-sectional mixed methods approach using a sequential explanatory design was conducted from December 2019 to January 2020. The first quantitative stage was conducted in 15 ICUs belonging to the two university hospitals in the region of Sousse (Tunisia). All the 344 healthcare professionals (clinical staff) working for more than 1 month in these ICUs were contacted in order to take part in the study. In the second qualitative stage 12 participants were interviewed based on purposive sampling.

resultsAll of the PSC dimensions had a score of less than 50%. The developed dimension was 'teamwork within units' (48.8%). The less developed dimensions were 'frequency of event reporting' (20.8%), 'communication openness' (22.2%) and 'non-punitive response to error' (19.7%). Interviews' thematic analysis revealed four main themes including "Hospital management/system failure", "Teamwork and communication", "Error management" and "Working conditions".

conclusionThis research revealed that PSC is still in need of improvement and provided a clearer picture of the patient safety issues that require specific attention. Improving PSC through the use of quality management and error reporting systems may help to improve patient safety outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient SafetySafety ManagementCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsOrganizational CultureSurveys and QuestionnairesIntensive carePatient safetyPatient safety cultureQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID35232452
PMCPMC8887118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.