Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232451›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Health facility management and primary health care performance in Uganda.

June-Ho Kim, Griffith A Bell, Asaf Bitton, Eesha V Desai, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Fredrick Makumbi, Elizabeth Nabiwemba, Hannah L Ratcliffe, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Simon P S Kibira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

June-Ho KimAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. jkim@ariadnelabs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-0717
Griffith A BellAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Asaf BittonAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Eesha V DesaiAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Lisa R HirschhornNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fredrick MakumbiMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizabeth NabiwembaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Hannah L RatcliffeAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Fred Wabwire-MangenMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Simon P S KibiraMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Dan SchwarzAriadne Labs (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Brigham and Women's Hospital), 401 Park Drive, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1149078Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1163880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary health care is a critical foundation of high-quality health systems. Health facility management has been studied in high-income countries, but there are significant measurement gaps about facility management and primary health care performance in low and middle-income countries. A primary health care facility management evaluation tool (PRIME-Tool) was initially piloted in Ghana where better facility management was associated with higher performance on select primary health care outcomes such as essential drug availability, trust in providers, ease of following a provider's advice, and overall patient-reported quality rating. In this study, we sought to understand health facility management within Uganda's decentralized primary health care system.

methodsWe administered and analyzed a cross-sectional household and health facility survey conducted in Uganda in 2019, assessing facility management using the PRIME-Tool.

resultsBetter facility management was associated with better essential drug availability but not better performance on measures of stocking equipment. Facilities with better PRIME-Tool management scores trended towards better performance on a number of experiential quality measures. We found significant disparities in the management performance of primary health care facilities. In particular, patients with greater wealth and education and those living in urban areas sought care at facilities that performed better on management. Private facilities and hospitals performed better on the management index than public facilities and health centers and clinics.

conclusionsThese results suggest that investments in stronger facility management in Uganda may strengthen key aspects of facility readiness such as essential drug availability and potentially could affect experiential quality of care. Nevertheless, the stark disparities demonstrate that Uganda policymakers need to target investments strategically in order to improve primary health care equitably across socioeconomic status and geography. Moreover, other low and middle-income countries may benefit from the use of the PRIME-Tool to rapidly assess facility management with the goal of understanding and improving primary health care performance.

Indexed as

Drugs, EssentialHealth FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareUgandaDrugs, EssentialEssential drugsHealth facilitiesManagementPrimary health careQuality

Identifiers

PMID35232451
PMCPMC8886189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.