Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35232420›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Spanish translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the SarQoL®: a specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia.

Beatriz Montero-Errasquín, Nieves Vaquero-Pinto, Vicente Sánchez-Cadenas, Anton Geerinck, Elisabet Sánchez-García, Jesús Mateos-Nozal, José Manuel Ribera-Casado, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validating Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surveys in Other Languages.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Validation of the German version of the SarQoLAging clinical and experimental research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz Montero-ErrasquínServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. beatriz.montero@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9389-9654
Nieves Vaquero-PintoServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente Sánchez-CadenasServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Anton GeerinckDivision of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Place du 20 Août 7, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Elisabet Sánchez-GarcíaServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Mateos-NozalServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Ribera-CasadoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Pl. de Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso J Cruz-JentoftServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS Madrid, Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015, a specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia, SarQoL®, was developed and validated in French. Since then, SarQoL® has been adapted and validated in different languages. We prepared a translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the psychometric properties of the SarQoL® into Spanish.

methodsA cross-sectional study with 86 participants. The translation and adaptation followed international guidelines with two direct translations, a synthesized version of the direct translations, two reverse translations, consensus by an expert committee of a pre-final version, pre-test by end users and final version. The discriminative power (logistic regression analyses), construct validity (Pearson and Spearman´s correlation), internal consistency (Cronbach´s alpha coefficient), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and ceiling and floor effects were analyzed.

resultsThe Spanish version showed good construct validity (high correlation with comparable domains of the SF-36), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.84) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.967, 95%, CI 0.917 - 0.989). However, it had no discriminative power between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic participants defined with the EWGSOP and FNIH diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia. It did show discriminative power between patients with decreased vs normal muscle strength (54.9 vs. 62.6, p 0.009) and low vs. normal physical performance (57.3 vs. 70.2; p 0.005). No ceiling or floor effect was found.

conclusionsThe Spanish version of SarQoL® has similar psychometric properties to those of the original version of the instrument. It did not discriminate between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients diagnosed according to the EWGSOP or FNIH criteria, but it did with those with low muscle strength and low physical performance.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSarcopeniaCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLanguagePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsHealth surveysMuscle functionPhysical functional performance

Identifiers

PMID35232420
PMCPMC8887022
OpenAlexW4214664485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.