ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2022
Image reconstruction for endoscopic photoacoustic tomography including effects of detector responses.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In photoacoustic tomography (PAT), conventional image reconstruction methods are generally based on the assumption of an ideal point-like ultrasonic detector. This assumption is appropriate when the receiving surface of the detector is sufficiently small and/or the distance between the imaged object and the detector is large enough. However, it does not hold in endoscopic applications of PAT. In this study, we propose a model-based image reconstruction method for endoscopic photoacoustic tomography (EPAT), considering the effect of detector responses on image quality. We construct a forward model to physically describe the imaging process of EPAT, including the generation of the initial pressure due to optical absorption and thermoelastic expansion, the propagation of photoacoustic waves in tissues, and the acoustic measurement. The model outputs the theoretical sampling voltage signal, which is the response of the ultrasonic detector to the acoustic pressure reaching its receiving surface. The images representing the distribution map of the optical absorption energy density on cross-sections of the imaged luminal structures are reconstructed from the sampling voltage signals output by the detector through iterative inversion of the forward model. Compared with the conventional approaches based on back-projection and other imaging models, our method improved the quality and spatial resolution of the resulting images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.