ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022
Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroactive Pollution Disrupts Cognition in Fish by Causing Sex-Specific Effects on Spatial Learning.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Scale-dependent foraging behaviour and habitat associations of two sympatric marine top predators.Landscape ecology · 2026Article
- Habitat fidelity of adult grey seals over multiple years in a changing marine ecosystem.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Proactive and reactive movement behaviours shape the antipredator sequence in a large herbivore.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Linking ringed seal foraging behaviour to environmental variability.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Ecological drivers of movement for two sympatric marine predators in the California current large marine ecosystem.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Movements and spatial usage of harbour seals in the Elbe estuary in Germany.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Drivers of polar bear behavior and the possible effects of prey availability on foraging strategy.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- Equivalence classification, learning by exclusion, and long-term memory in pinnipeds: cognitive mechanisms demonstrated through research with subjects under human care and in the field.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Desert Ants Learn to Avoid Pitfall Traps While Foraging.Biology · 2022Article
- Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Human disturbance, preys and refuge cover shape top predator movements in anthropogenic landscapes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
- Central place foraging in an ectotherm and the long-term liability of selecting the "wrong" central place.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the patchiness and long-term predictability of marine resources, memory of high-quality foraging grounds is expected to provide fitness advantages for central place foragers. However, it remains challenging to characterize how marine predators integrate memory with recent prey encounters to adjust fine-scale movement and use of foraging patches. Here, we used two months of movement data from harbour seals (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.