Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35231942›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie2022

[Process for the Implementation of Evidence-Based Parenteral Nutrition in German Perinatal Centres - Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Network].

Julia Hoffmann, Nadja Haiden, Jürgen Babl, Christoph Fusch, Johanna Kostenzer, Brar Piening, Sebastian Schubert, Silke Mader, Arbeitsgruppe parenterale Ernährung von EFCNI, GNPI, ADKA

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia HoffmannScientific Affairs Department, European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5504-7311
Nadja HaidenUniversitätsklinik für Kinder- u. Jugendheilkunde Wien, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.
Jürgen BablBundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e.V. , Berlin, Germany.
Christoph FuschKlinik für Neugeborene, Kinder und Jugendliche, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Johanna KostenzerScientific Affairs Department, European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants, München, Germany.
Brar PieningCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian SchubertBundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e.V. , Berlin, Germany.
Silke MaderScientific Affairs Department, European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-0177
Arbeitsgruppe parenterale Ernährung von EFCNI, GNPI, ADKA
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFederation of German Industries · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DENuremberg Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinik für Kinder und Jugendpsychiatrie · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParenteral nutrition, usually indicated for preterm infants with a birthweight<1500 g and sick newborns, enables the supply with critical nutrients. As a high degree of therapy safety is required, a European guideline provides recommendations for safe therapy procedures. The present project aimed to evaluate the implementation of the European guideline in German perinatal centers and to identify possible barriers that impede its implementation. A further goal was to develop solution approaches to overcome possible barriers. METHODS AND

resultsA multidisciplinary cooperation conducted an online survey questioning the current implementation procedures of the European guideline among pediatricians and hospital pharmacists. Results show barriers in the provisioning process of parenteral nutrition that hinder a guideline-compliant implementation in practice. Based on results of this survey, an expert network developed an interactive toolkit with simplified guideline recommendations, guideline-compliant advice for practice, best-practice examples, forms, and handouts. It seeks to encourage critical reflection of routine processes and provides concrete solutions to overcome barriers in practice.

conclusionThe current procedures related to parenteral nutrition deviate from guideline recommendations. The developed toolkit provides practice-oriented support aiming to enhance the guideline-compliant implementation of parenteral nutrition in perinatal centers.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureParenteral NutritionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35231942
PMCPMC9398564
OpenAlexW4214816402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.