Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35231043›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Relationships between Dota 2 expertise and decision-making ability.

Daniel Eriksson Sörman, Karl Eriksson Dahl, Daniel Lindmark, Patrik Hansson, Mariana Vega-Mendoza, Jessica Körning-Ljungberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Eriksson SörmanDepartment of Health, Education, and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2709-9966
Karl Eriksson DahlDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Daniel LindmarkDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Patrik HanssonDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Mariana Vega-MendozaDepartment of Health, Education, and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Jessica Körning-LjungbergDepartment of Health, Education, and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-3270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esports is an often time-consuming activity that has become increasingly popular with billions of players all over the world. The objective of this study was to investigate if there is a relationship between skill level in the strategy video game Dota 2, a game that places many demands on decision making to be successful, and decision making under ambiguity and experience as measured by performance in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a task known to have ecological validity. Two indicators of players' performance in Dota 2, namely match-making rating (MMR) and Medal, were used as predictors of performance in the IGT in path models. Results showed that Medal was a significant predictor of performance in IGT, while MMR score was borderline significant. The cognitive reflection task, included in the models as an indicator of the ability to engage in conscious, analytical, rational, and logical thinking, was a significant predictor of performance in IGT, and was significantly and positively related to MMR. The findings from this study give insight into the cognitive demands related to performance in Dota 2. Although results suggest that strategy video gaming may be a factor that contributes to increased decision making abilities, a reversed relationship is also possible, whereby individuals who are better at decision making are also more likely to become successful in Dota-2. More studies, preferably longitudinal, are needed to replicate the findings of this study and to establish the directionality between factors.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGamblingHumansNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID35231043
PMCPMC8887737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.