Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35231039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Strategies to improve access to cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders: A scoping review.

Jean-Daniel Carrier, Frances Gallagher, Alain Vanasse, Pasquale Roberge

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean-Daniel CarrierDepartment of family medicine and emergency medicine, PRIMUS research group, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5908-7567
Frances GallagherSchool of nursing, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Alain VanasseDepartment of family medicine and emergency medicine, PRIMUS research group, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Pasquale RobergeDepartment of family medicine and emergency medicine, PRIMUS research group, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies to improve access to evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) include but are not limited to implementation strategies. No currently available framework accounts for the full scope of strategies available to allow stakeholders to improve access to EBPTs. Anxiety disorders are common and impactful mental conditions for which EBPTs, especially cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT), are well-established yet often hard to access.

objectiveDescribe and classify the various strategies reported to improve access to CBT for anxiety disorders.

methodsScoping review with a keyword search of several databases + additional grey literature documents reporting on strategies to improve access to CBT for anxiety disorders. A thematic and inductive analysis of data based on grounded theory principles was conducted using NVivo.

resultsWe propose to classify strategies to improve access to CBT for anxiety disorders as either "Contributing to the evidence base," "Identifying CBT delivery modalities to adopt in practice," "Building capacity for CBT delivery," "Attuning the process of access to local needs," "Engaging potential service users," or "Improving programs and policies." Each of these strategies is defined, and critical information for their operationalization is provided, including the actors that could be involved in their implementation. IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review highlights gaps in implementation research regarding improving access to EBPTs that should be accounted for in future studies.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAnxiety DisordersHumans

Identifiers

PMID35231039
PMCPMC8887746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.