Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35231033›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Long-term Chikungunya sequelae and quality of life 2.5 years post-acute disease in a prospective cohort in Curaçao.

Churnalisa Doran, Jelte Elsinga, Ante Fokkema, Kevin Berenschot, Izzy Gerstenbluth, Ashley Duits, Norediz Lourents, Yaskara Halabi, Johannes Burgerhof, Ajay Bailey and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Churnalisa DoranUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-2758
Jelte ElsingaCuraçao Biomedical and Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-4820
Ante FokkemaUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kevin BerenschotUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-3493
Izzy GerstenbluthCuraçao Biomedical and Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-4709
Ashley DuitsCuraçao Biomedical and Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-8266
Norediz LourentsDepartment of Epidemiology and Research, Medical and Public Health Service Curaçao, Willemstad, Curaçao.
Yaskara HalabiDepartment of Epidemiology and Research, Medical and Public Health Service Curaçao, Willemstad, Curaçao.
Johannes BurgerhofUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3827-9601
Ajay BaileyDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Adriana TamiUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-9144
University of Curaçao · CWUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the persistence and impact of non-rheumatic symptoms after acute chikungunya disease. We have studied the clinical presentation and long-term impact of rheumatic and non-rheumatic symptoms on health related quality of life (QoL) 2.5 years after disease onset. Additionally, the validity of the Curaçao Long-Term Chikungunya Sequelae (CLTCS) score in classifying disease severity over time was evaluated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis prospective cohort study followed 248 chikungunya patients. Symptoms and SF-36 QoL were evaluated during baseline and follow-up at 2.5 years using questionnaires. Chikungunya disease status was classified using the CLTCS-score. At 2.5 years after disease onset patients were classified as being recovered (43%), mildly (35%) or highly (22%) affected. In comparison to mildly affected, highly affected patients reported the highest prevalence of ongoing rheumatic and non-rheumatic/psychological symptoms, with increased prevalence of arthralgia in the lower extremities (p = .01) and fatigue (p = .049) over time, and higher pain intensity (p < .001). Compared to mildly affected, being highly affected was associated with weakness in the lower extremities (OR: 1.90; CI: 1.29-2.80, p = .001) and worsened physical and mental QoL impairment.

conclusionsPatients are both physically and psychologically affected by rheumatic and non-rheumatic symptoms of long-term chikungunya disease. The CLTCS-score is an easy to use instrument for classifying long-term chikungunya disease severity and impact and can facilitate health care providers in identifying highly affected patients who are prone to develop severe QoL impairment. Highly affected patients are recommended to be treated in a multidisciplinary setting to improve physical and psychological functioning, and QoL.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverQuality of LifeAcute DiseaseCohort StudiesCuracaoDisease OutbreaksDisease ProgressionHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35231033
PMCPMC8887759
OpenAlexW4214703298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.