Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230887›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2022

Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation.

Lorri Birkholz, Patrick Kutschar, Firuzan Sari Kundt, Margitta Beil-Hildebrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorri Birkholz575981Chatham University School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2383-1689
Patrick KutscharInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, 31507Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-2552
Firuzan Sari KundtInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, 31507Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Margitta Beil-HildebrandInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, 31507Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthical decision-making confidence develops from clinical expertise and is a core competency for nurse leaders. No tool exists to measure confidence levels in nurse leaders based upon an ethical decision-making framework.

aimsThe objective of this research was to compare ethical decision-making among nurse leaders in the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe by developing and testing a newly constructed Ethical Decision-Making Confidence (EDMC) scale.

methodsThe cross-sectional survey included 18 theory-derived questions on ethical decision-making confidence which were used to develop the scale.

participantsA convenience sample of nurse leaders from the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe who self-identified as holding a leadership position. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was given by the IRB Board of a U.S. university. Participation in the survey implied voluntary consent.

resultsThe scale's item structure dimensionality and subscale's reliability were analyzed and compared between nurse leaders from all four countries. A principal component analysis (PCA) produced a 15-item bi-dimensional EDMC scale yielding a skill-related (9-item) and a behavior-related (6-item) confidence dimension. EDMC subscales showed good-to-excellent internal consistency. In both subscales, U.S. nurse leaders rated their mean EDMC score higher than their German-speaking counterparts in Europe. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study is the first of its kind to focus on nurse leaders' confidence regarding ethical decision-making in an international context. An overarching factor structure was identified, which is shared by the two samples of nurse leaders and to examine (sub)scales' psychometric properties.

conclusionThis newly developed scale is an effective tool for measuring ethical decision-making confidence in nurse leaders. The promising results of this study should be replicated to ensure validity and reliability of the EDMC scale measuring skill-related and behavior-related concepts and include nurse leaders from various cultural, social, and demographic groups.

Indexed as

MoralsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesethics and leadership/managementmoral distressmoral/ethical climate of organizationsmoral sensitivityprofessional ethics

Identifiers

PMID35230887
PMCPMC9289993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.