Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230700›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2022

Approach motivation and loneliness: Individual differences and parasympathetic activity.

Karen E Smith, Seth D Pollak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Away from the herd: loneliness as a dysfunction of social alignment.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Children's value-based decision making.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen E SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-7346
Seth D PollakDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5184-9846

Funding

Emotion Processing:Risk for Psychopathology in ChildrenR01MH061285 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SETH D POLLAK · 2001 to 2026
$12.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN EMOTION RESEARCHT32MH018931 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Richard J Davidson · 1989 to 2026
$11.6M
Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Brittany Gail Travers · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061285NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness, or perceived social isolation, is linked to a number of negative long-term effects on both mental and physical health. However, how an individual responds to feeling lonely may influence their risk for later negative health outcomes. Here, we sought to clarify what influences variability in individuals' motivated responses to loneliness. Specifically, we assessed whether resting parasympathetic activity, a physiological marker linked to flexible adaptation, facilitates increased approach-oriented behaviors. Seventy-four adult participants underwent a conditioning paradigm assessing how they approach and avoid rewards and threats. Individuals with higher levels of loneliness and high resting parasympathetic activity were more likely to demonstrate approach behaviors. We discuss these findings in terms of the role resting parasympathetic activity may play in facilitating adaptive responses to feeling socially isolated.

Indexed as

LonelinessMotivationAdultEmotionsHumansIndividualitySocial Isolationapproachdecision makingheart rate variabilitylonelinessmotivationparasympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID35230700
PMCPMC9283255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.