Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230693›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Artificial Intelligence for Precision Oncology.

Sherry Bhalla, Alessandro Laganà

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology: methodological bases, practical applications and ethical and regulatory issues.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sherry BhallaTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Alessandro LaganàDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. alessandro.lagana@mssm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision oncology is an innovative approach to cancer care in which diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment are informed by the individual patient's genetic and molecular profile. The rapid development of novel high-throughput omics technologies in recent years has led to the generation of massive amount of complex patient data, which in turn has prompted the development of novel computational infrastructures, platforms, and tools to store, retrieve, and analyze this data efficiently. Artificial intelligence (AI), and in particular its subfield of machine learning, is ideal for deciphering patterns in large datasets and offers unique opportunities for advancing precision oncology. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the various public data resources and applications of AI in precision oncology and cancer research, from subtype identification to drug prioritization, using multi-omics datasets. We also discuss the impact of AI-powered medical image analysis in oncology and present the first diagnostic FDA-approved AI-powered tools.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceCancerCancer subtypeDeep learningDrug prioritizationHigh-throughput technologiesMachine learningMedical image analysisMulti-omicsPrecision oncologySequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.