ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
RNA-seq Fusion Detection in Clinical Oncology.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The actionable transcriptome: a framework for incorporating RNA sequencing into precision oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- An innovative full-size pathogenic tandem duplication mutation precise detection system based on next-generation sequencing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Breadth versus depth: whole transcriptome sequencing has reduced sensitivity for detection of clinically relevant fusions compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Genomic Landscape of Malignant Phyllodes Tumors Identifies Subsets for Targeted Therapy.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Decoding Oncofusions: Unveiling Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Prospects for Personalized Cancer Therapies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene fusions play a prominent role in the oncogenesis of many cancers and have been extensively targeted as biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes. Detection methods span a number of platforms, including cytogenetics (e.g., FISH), targeted qPCR, and sequencing-based assays. Before the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), fusion testing was primarily targeted to specific genome loci, with assays tailored for previously characterized fusion events. The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) allows for genome-wide screening for the simultaneous detection of both known and novel fusions. RNA-seq, in particular, offers the possibility of rapid turn-around testing with less dedicated sequencing than WGS. This makes it an attractive target for clinical oncology testing, particularly when transcriptome data can be multi-purposed for tumor classification and additional analyses. Despite considerable efforts and substantial progress, however, genome-wide screening for fusions solely based on RNA-seq data remains an ongoing challenge. A host of technical artifacts adversely impact the sensitivity and specificity of existing software tools. In this chapter, the general strategies employed by current fusion software are discussed, and a selection of available fusion detection tools are surveyed. Despite its current limitations, RNA-seq-based fusion detection offers a more comprehensive and efficient strategy as compared to multiple targeted fusion assays. When thoughtfully employed within a wider ecosystem of diagnostic assays and clinical information, RNA-seq fusion detection represents a powerful tool for precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.