Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230684›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Assessment of Microsatellite Instability from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Victor Renault, Emmanuel Tubacher, Alexandre How-Kit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor RenaultLaboratory for Bioinformatics, Foundation Jean Dausset - CEPH, Paris, France.
Emmanuel TubacherLaboratory for Bioinformatics, Foundation Jean Dausset - CEPH, Paris, France.
Alexandre How-KitLaboratory for Genomics, Foundation Jean Dausset - CEPH, Paris, France. alexandre.how-kit@fjd-ceph.org.
Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic alteration due to a deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system, where microsatellites accumulate insertions/deletions. This phenotype has been extensively characterized in colorectal cancer and is also sought in the context of Lynch syndrome diagnosis. It has recently been described in dozens of cancer types from whole genome/exome sequencing data, bearing some prognostic information. Moreover, MSI has also proven to be a major predicator of the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in solid cancer patients. Among the different methods developed for MSI detection in cancer, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a promising and versatile technology offering many possibilities and advantages in diverse clinical applications compared to the gold standard PCR and capillary electrophoresis approach. NGS could notably increase the number of analyzed microsatellites and potentially be used to analyze other genetic alterations required for precision oncology. However, it requires the development of robust new computational algorithms for the analysis of NGS microsatellite data. In this chapter, we describe the different approaches developed for the assessment of MSI from NGS data in cancer, including the different microsatellite panels and computational algorithms proposed, highlighting their advantages and drawbacks, and their evaluation in different clinical applications.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsPrecision MedicineBioinformaticsCancerComputational methodsMachine learningMicrosatellite instabilityMSI detection methodNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35230684
OpenAlexW4214494341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.