Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230683›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Identification of Copy Number Alterations from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Sheida Nabavi, Fatima Zare

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheida NabaviComputer Science and Engineering, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Sheida.nabavi@uconn.edu.
Fatima ZareComputer Science and Engineering, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV), which is deletion and multiplication of segments of a genome, is an important genomic alteration that has been associated with many diseases including cancer. In cancer, CNVs are mostly somatic aberrations that occur during cancer evolution. Advances in sequencing technologies and arrival of next-generation sequencing data (whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing or targeted sequencing) have opened up an opportunity to detect CNVs with higher accuracy and resolution. Many computational methods have been developed for somatic CNV detection, which is a challenging task due to complexity of cancer sequencing data, high level of noise and biases in the sequencing process, and big data nature of sequencing data. Nevertheless, computational detection of CNV in sequencing data has resulted in the discovery of actionable cancer-specific CNVs to be used to guide cancer therapeutics, contributing to significant progress in precision oncology. In this chapter, we start by introducing CNVs. Then, we discuss the main approaches and methods developed for detecting somatic CNV for next-generation sequencing data, along with its challenges. Finally, we describe the overall workflow for CNV detection and introduce the most common publicly available software tools developed for somatic CNV detection and analysis.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsNeoplasmsAlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicineSoftwareCNV detectionCopy number variationWhole-exome sequencingWhole genome sequencing, Somatic aberrations

Identifiers

PMID35230683
OpenAlexW4214557503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.