Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230640›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Adjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database.

Juan Pujol-Rafols, Ozlem Uyanik, Yuhamy Curbelo-Peña, Amr Al Abbas, Stefanie Devriendt, Anabela Guerra, Miguel F Herrera, Jacques Himpens, Eva Pardina, Sjaak Pouwels and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Juan Pujol-RafolsClínica Mi Tres Torres, Barcelona, Spain. juan.pujol.rafols@gmail.com.
Ozlem UyanikConsorci Sanitari Alt Penedès I Garraf, Barcelona, Spain.
Yuhamy Curbelo-PeñaConsorci Sanitari Alt Penedès I Garraf, Barcelona, Spain.
Amr Al AbbasAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon.
Stefanie DevriendtDepartment of abdominal surgery, ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anabela GuerraCentro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Miguel F HerreraInstituto Nacional de Nutrición. Centro Médico ABC, México City, México.
Jacques HimpensDepartment of abdominal surgery, ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium.
Eva PardinaDepartament de Bioquímica I Biomedicina Molecular, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sjaak PouwelsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Almino RamosGastro-Obeso-Center - Advanced Institute In Bariatric And Metabolic Surgery, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rui J RibeiroCentro Multidisciplinar da Doença Metabólica Grupo Lusiadas Saúde, Hospital Lusíadas Amadora, Lisboa, Portugal.
Bassem SafadiAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Beirut, Lebanon.
Hugo Sanchez-AguilarInstituto Nacional de Nutrición. Centro Médico ABC, México City, México.
Claire E E De VriesOnze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)-West, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart Van WagensveldNMC Royal Hospital, Khalifa City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as a rescue technique for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders.

aimWe sought to analyze, complications, mortality, and medium-term weight loss results after LAGB conversion to OAGB.

methodsData analysis of an international multicenter database.

resultsOne hundred eighty-nine LAGB-to-OAGB operations were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-seven (46.0%) were converted in one stage. Patients operated on in two stages had a higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (37.9 vs. 41.3 kg/m

conclusionConversion from LAGB to OAGB is safe and effective. The one-stage approach appears to be the preferred option in non-complicate cases, while the two-step approach is mostly done for more complicated cases.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastroplastyLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidData AnalysisHumansPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConversionGastric bandingLAGBOAGBOne anastomosis gastric bypassRevisionRevisional surgery

Identifiers

PMID35230640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.