Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230622›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2022

Targeted Electronic Patient Portal Messaging Increases Hepatitis C Virus Screening in Primary Care: a Randomized Study.

Douglas Halket, Jimmy Dang, Anuradha Phadke, Channa Jayasekera, W Ray Kim, Paul Kwo, Lance Downing, Aparna Goel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A novel approach to patient portal activation data to power equity improvements.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas HalketDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. dhalket@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-9664
Jimmy DangPopulation Health, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Anuradha PhadkeDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Channa JayasekeraGastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, WA, USA.
W Ray KimDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Paul KwoDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Lance DowningDepartment of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Aparna GoelDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceElectronic health record (EHR) tools such as direct-to-patient messaging and automated lab orders are effective at improving uptake of preventive health measures. It is unknown if patient engagement in primary care impacts efficacy of such messaging.

objectiveTo determine whether more engaged patients, defined as those who have an upcoming visit scheduled, are more likely to respond to a direct-to-patient message with an automated lab order for hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening.

designRandomized trial

participantsOne thousand six hundred randomly selected Stanford Primary Care patients, 800 with an upcoming visit within 6 months and 800 without, born between 1945 and 1965 who were due for HCV screening. Each group was randomly divided into cohorts of 400 subjects each. Subjects were followed for 1 year.

interventionOne 400 subject cohort in each group received a direct-to-patient message through the EHR portal with HCV antibody lab order. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The EHR was queried on a monthly basis for 6 months after the intervention to monitor which subjects completed HCV screening. For any subjects screened positive for HCV, follow-up through the cascade of HCV care was monitored, and if needed, scheduled by the study team. KEY

resultsOf 1600 subjects, 538 (34%) completed HCV screening. In the stratum without an upcoming appointment, 18% in the control group completed screening compared to 26% in intervention group (p<0.01). Similarly, in the stratum with an upcoming appointment, 34% in the control group completed screening compared to 58% in the intervention group (p<0.01).

conclusionDirect-to-patient messaging coupled with automated lab orders improved HCV screening rates compared to standard of care, particularly in more engaged patients. Including this intervention in primary care can maximize screening with each visit, which is particularly valuable in times when physical throughput in the healthcare system may be low.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CPatient PortalsElectronicsHepacivirusHumansMass ScreeningPrimary Health Careelectronic health recordhepatitis Cpatient engagementpatient messagingscreening

Identifiers

PMID35230622
PMCPMC9551157
OpenAlexW4214621428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.