Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230517›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Coronary calcium scores on dual-source photon-counting computed tomography: an adapted Agatston methodology aimed at radiation dose reduction.

Niels R van der Werf, Marcel J W Greuter, Ronald Booij, Aad van der Lugt, Ricardo P J Budde, Marcel van Straten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niels R van der Werf *Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. n.vanderwerf@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-052X
Marcel J W Greuter *Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald BooijDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ricardo P J BuddeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel van StratenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine mono-energetic (monoE) level-specific photon-counting CT (PCCT) Agatston thresholds, to yield monoE level independent Agatston scores validated with a dynamic cardiac phantom. Also, we examined the potential of dose reduction for PCCT coronary artery calcium (CAC) studies, when reconstructed at low monoE levels.

methodsTheoretical CAC monoE thresholds were calculated with data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database. Artificial CAC with three densities were moved in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom at 0 and 60-75 bpm, and scanned at full and 50% dose on a first-generation dual-source PCCT. For all densities, Agatston scores and maximum CT numbers were determined. Agatston scores were compared with the reference at full dose and 70 keV monoE level; deviations (95% confidence interval) < 10% were deemed to be clinically not-relevant.

resultsAveraged over all monoE levels, measured CT numbers deviated from theoretical CT numbers by 6%, 13%, and - 4% for low-, medium-, and high-density CAC, respectively. At 50% reduced dose and 60-75 bpm, Agatston score deviations were non-relevant for 60 to 100 keV and 60 to 120 keV for medium- and high-density CAC, respectively.

conclusionMonoE level-specific Agatston score thresholds resulted in similar scores as in standard reconstructions at 70 keV. PCCT allows for a potential dose reduction of 50% for CAC scoring using low monoE reconstructions for medium- and high-density CAC. KEY POINTS: • Mono-energy level-specific Agatston thresholds allow for reproducible coronary artery calcium quantification on mono-energetic images. • Increased calcium contrast-to-noise ratio at reduced mono-energy levels allows for coronary artery calcium quantification at 50% reduced radiation dose for medium- and high-density calcifications.

Indexed as

CalciumCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDrug TaperingHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumCalciumCoronary vesselsImaging phantomsRadiation dosageX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID35230517
PMCPMC9279264
OpenAlexW4214479046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.