Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230477›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2022

Validity of food additive maltodextrin as placebo and effects on human gut physiology: systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Rawan Almutairi, Abigail Raffner Basson, Pamela Wearsh, Fabio Cominelli, Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Effect of AG1Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Improvement of Bladder Dysfunction byPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rawan Almutairi *Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Abigail Raffner Basson *Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Pamela WearshDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Fabio Cominelli *Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alexander Rodriguez-PalaciosDepartment of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. axr503@case.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-5605
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Ubiquitination Pathways Mediating Chronic Intestinal InflammationP01DK091222 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI COMINELLI, FABIO · 2011 to 2020
$16.5M
The Cleveland Digestive Diseases Research Core Center (DDRCC)P30DK097948 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Fabio Cominelli · 2015 to 2026
$15.6M
MECHANISMS OF EXPERIMENTAL CROHNS DISEASER01DK055812 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI COMINELLI, FABIO · 1999 to 2019
$4.9M
Effect of an Anti-Inflammatory Diet on Gut Homeostasis in Active and Experimental Crohn's DiseaseK01DK127008 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI RAFFNER, ABIGAIL · 2021 to 2025
$610k
Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria in Crohn's DiseaseR21DK118373 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ-PALACIOS, ALEXANDER · 2018 to 2020
$601k
Mechanisms of Experimental Crohn's DiseaseR56DK055812 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI COMINELLI, FABIO, RODRIGUEZ-PALACIOS, ALEXANDER · 2021 to 2021
$403k
Functional characterization of human gut microbiota's response to diet in two gnotobiotic SAMP1/YitFc mouse models of Crohn's disease ileitisF32DK117585 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI RAFFNER, ABIGAIL · 2018 to 2018
$64k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK055812NIDDK NIH HHS DK091222NIDDK NIH HHS DK097948NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK117585NIDDK NIH HHS F32DK117585NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK127008NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK127008NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK091222NIDDK NIH HHS P01DK091222NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK097948NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055812NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK118373NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK118373NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK055812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMaltodextrin (MDX) is a polysaccharide food additive commonly used as oral placebo/control to investigate treatments/interventions in humans. The aims of this study were to appraise the MDX effects on human physiology/gut microbiota, and to assess the validity of MDX as a placebo-control.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of randomized-placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) where MDX was used as an orally consumed placebo. Data were extracted from study results where effects (physiological/microbial) were attributed (or not) to MDX, and from study participant outcomes data, before-and-after MDX consumption, for post-publication 're-analysis' using paired-data statistics.

resultsOf two hundred-sixteen studies on 'MDX/microbiome', seventy RCTs (n = 70) were selected for analysis. Supporting concerns regarding the validity of MDX as a placebo, the majority of RCTs (60%, CI 95% = 0.48-0.76; n = 42/70; Fisher-exact p = 0.001, expected < 5/70) reported MDX-induced physiological (38.1%, n = 16/42; p = 0.005), microbial metabolite (19%, n = 8/42; p = 0.013), or microbiome (50%, n = 21/42; p = 0.0001) effects. MDX-induced alterations on gut microbiome included changes in the Firmicutes and/or Bacteroidetes phyla, and Lactobacillus and/or Bifidobacterium species. Effects on various immunological, inflammatory markers, and gut function/permeability were also documented in 25.6% of the studies (n = 10/42). Notably, there was considerable variability in the direction of effects (decrease/increase), MDX dose, form (powder/pill), duration, and disease/populations studied. Overall, only 20% (n = 14/70; p = 0.026) of studies cross-referenced MDX as a justifiable/innocuous placebo, while 2.9% of studies (n = 2/70) acknowledged their data the opposite.

conclusionOrally-consumed MDX often (63.9% of RCTs) induces effects on human physiology/gut microbiota. Such effects question the validity of MDX as a placebo-control in human clinical trials.

Indexed as

Food AdditivesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeBifidobacteriumHumansPolysaccharidesFood AdditivesmaltodextrinPolysaccharidesExperimental designFirmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratioFood additiveGut microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35230477
PMCPMC9835112
OpenAlexW4214769845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.