ArticleJAMA2022
Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Concurrent intra-aortic balloon pump and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis of multivariate studies.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Global research trends and hotspots in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: a bibliometric review and knowledge mapping approach (1990-2024).Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Dapagliflozin Augmentation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure Following PCI-Treated Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Physical activity and myocardial infarction risk: insights from the global burden of disease study 1990-2021 and Mendelian randomization analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on stacked generalization to predict psychosocial maladjustment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Age‑adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and in‑hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock: A retrospective cohort study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of the Dectin-2/TNF-Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Blood urea nitrogen and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with MI or cardiogenic shock: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35230399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.