Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230245›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Increasing the Effectiveness of a Physical Activity Smartphone Intervention With Positive Suggestions: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aleksandrina Skvortsova, Talia Cohen Rodrigues, David de Buisonjé, Tobias Kowatsch, Prabhakaran Santhanam, Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen, Henriët van Middendorp, Andrea Evers

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aleksandrina Skvortsova *Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0512-0792
Talia Cohen RodriguesHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-5285
David de BuisonjéHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-1130
Tobias KowatschCentre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5939-4145
Prabhakaran SanthanamCentre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-4888
Dieuwke S VeldhuijzenHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-1019
Henriët van MiddendorpHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-0895
Andrea EversHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-5091
ETH Zurich · CHLeiden University · NLMcGill University · CAUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth interventions have the potential to increase the physical activity of users. However, their effectiveness varies, and they often have only short-term effects. A possible way of enhancing their effectiveness is to increase the positive outcome expectations of users by giving them positive suggestions regarding the effectiveness of the intervention. It has been shown that when individuals have positive expectations regarding various types of interventions, they tend to benefit from these interventions more.

objectiveThe main objective of this web-based study is to investigate whether positive suggestions can change the expectations of participants regarding the effectiveness of a smartphone physical activity intervention and subsequently enhance the number of steps the participants take during the intervention. In addition, we study whether suggestions affect perceived app effectiveness, engagement with the app, self-reported vitality, and fatigue of the participants.

methodsThis study involved a 21-day fully automated physical activity intervention aimed at helping participants to walk more steps. The intervention was delivered via a smartphone-based app that delivered specific tasks to participants (eg, setting activity goals or looking for social support) and recorded their daily step count. Participants were randomized to either a positive suggestions group (69/133, 51.9%) or a control group (64/133, 48.1%). Positive suggestions emphasizing the effectiveness of the intervention were implemented in a web-based flyer sent to the participants before the intervention. Suggestions were repeated on days 8 and 15 of the intervention via the app.

resultsParticipants significantly increased their daily step count from baseline compared with 21 days of the intervention (t

conclusionsAlthough the suggestions did not affect the number of daily steps, they increased the positive expectations of the participants and decreased their fatigue. These results indicate that adding positive suggestions to eHealth physical activity interventions might be a promising way of influencing subjective but not objective outcomes of interventions. Future research should focus on finding ways of strengthening the suggestions, as they have the potential to boost the effectiveness of eHealth interventions.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/CWJES; https://osf.io/cwjes.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineExerciseHumansSmartphoneWalkingeHealthmobile healthmobile phoneoutcome expectationsphysical activitypositive suggestionswalking

Identifiers

PMID35230245
PMCPMC8924786
OpenAlexW4205212055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.