Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229910›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022

Exome sequencing as first-tier test for fetuses with severe central nervous system structural anomalies.

Y Yaron, V Ofen Glassner, A Mory, N Zunz Henig, A Kurolap, A Bar Shira, D Brabbing Goldstein, D Marom, L Ben Sira, H Baris Feldman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward structured fellowships in fetal neuroimaging.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Y YaronPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-7668
V Ofen GlassnerPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
A MoryPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
N Zunz HenigPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
A KurolapPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
A Bar ShiraPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
D Brabbing GoldsteinPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
D MaromPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
L Ben SiraSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
H Baris FeldmanPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
G MalingerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-206X
K Krajden HaratzSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-3548
A RechesPrenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrenatally detected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with a major CNS anomaly.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 114 cases referred for genetic evaluation following termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a major CNS anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasound. All fetuses were first analyzed by CMA. All CMA-negative cases were offered ES. CMA-positive cases were reanalyzed using ES to assess its ability to detect copy-number variants (CNVs).

resultsCMA identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNV in 11/114 (10%) cases. Eighty-six CMA-negative cases were analyzed using ES, which detected P/LP sequence variants in 38/86 (44%). Among recurrent cases (i.e. cases with a previously affected pregnancy), the incidence of P/LP sequence variants was non-significantly higher compared with non-recurrent ones (12/19 (63%) vs 26/67 (39%); P = 0.06). Among the 38 cases with an ES diagnosis, 20 (53%) were inherited and carried a significant risk of recurrence. Reanalysis of 10 CMA-positive cases by ES demonstrated that the bioinformatics pipeline used for sequence variant analysis also detected all P/LP CNVs, as well as three previously known non-causative CNVs.

conclusionsIn our study, ES provided a high diagnostic yield (> 50%) in fetuses with severe CNS structural anomalies, which may have been partly due to the highly selected case series that included post-TOP cases from a specialist referral center. These data suggest that ES may be considered as a first-tier test for the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal CNS anomalies, detecting both P/LP sequence variants and CNVs. This is of particular importance given the time constraints of an ongoing pregnancy and the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System DiseasesNervous System MalformationsCentral Nervous SystemChromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeExome SequencingFemaleFetusHumansMicroarray AnalysisPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective Studiesbraincentral nervous systemchromosomal microarraycopy-number variantexome sequencingfetusmalformationprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35229910
PMCPMC9328397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.