ArticleJournal of diabetes2022
Casual C peptide index: Predicting the subsequent need for insulin therapy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes under primary care.
Article in Journal of diabetes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- C-peptide Index under Non-fasting Conditions Can Predict the Likelihood of Future Insulin Therapy in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Receiving Insulin at Baseline.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Correlation between C-peptide and diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Utility of the random C-peptide and random C-peptide index at diagnosis as a predictor of disease type and long-term insulin secretory capacity in children with diabetes mellitus.Endocrine journal · 2025Article
- Article
- The average 30-minute post-prandial C-peptide predicted diabetic retinopathy progress: a retro-prospective study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Article
- Casual C peptide index: Predicting the subsequent need for insulin therapy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes under primary care.Journal of diabetes · 2022Article
- Application of urine C-peptide creatinine ratio in type 2 diabetic patients with different levels of renal function.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of residual beta cell function is indispensable in patients with type 2 diabetes as it informs not only diagnoses but also appropriate treatment modalities. However, there is a lack of convenient biomarkers for residual beta cell function. Therefore, we evaluated endogenous insulin level as a biomarker in outpatients who were being treated with insulin therapy and in patients who were introduced to insulin therapy after 4 years.
methodsData of 174 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (50% male) whose glycemia was moderately controlled (glycated A1c 7.3% [5.2%-14.8%]) were reviewed. Twenty patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower than 30 ml/min/1.73 m
resultsC-CPI and UCPCR were significantly lower in the insulin-treated patients than in the insulin-untreated patients (0.9 vs. 2.2, p < 0.0001; 24.7 vs. 75.5, p = 0.0003, respectively). Moreover, C-CPI were significantly lower in the insulin-requiring patients for 4 years than in the insulin-unrequiring patients (1.0 vs. 1.7, p = 0.0184). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both indicators of insulin secretion influenced the requirement for insulin therapy, but C-CPI could serve as the most convenient and useful biomarker for not only current insulin therapy requirements (p = 0.0002) but also the subsequent requirement for insulin therapy (p = 0.0008).
conclusionsC-CPI could be determined easily, and it was found to be a more practical marker for outpatients; therefore, our findings would have critical implications for primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.