Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229479›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes2022

Casual C peptide index: Predicting the subsequent need for insulin therapy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes under primary care.

Ryota Uehara, Eijiro Yamada, Yasuyo Nakajima, Aya Osaki, Shuichi Okada, Masanobu Yamada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryota UeharaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Eijiro YamadaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-8605
Yasuyo NakajimaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Aya OsakiDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Shuichi OkadaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-6840
Masanobu YamadaDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Gunma University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of residual beta cell function is indispensable in patients with type 2 diabetes as it informs not only diagnoses but also appropriate treatment modalities. However, there is a lack of convenient biomarkers for residual beta cell function. Therefore, we evaluated endogenous insulin level as a biomarker in outpatients who were being treated with insulin therapy and in patients who were introduced to insulin therapy after 4 years.

methodsData of 174 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (50% male) whose glycemia was moderately controlled (glycated A1c 7.3% [5.2%-14.8%]) were reviewed. Twenty patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower than 30 ml/min/1.73 m

resultsC-CPI and UCPCR were significantly lower in the insulin-treated patients than in the insulin-untreated patients (0.9 vs. 2.2, p < 0.0001; 24.7 vs. 75.5, p = 0.0003, respectively). Moreover, C-CPI were significantly lower in the insulin-requiring patients for 4 years than in the insulin-unrequiring patients (1.0 vs. 1.7, p = 0.0184). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both indicators of insulin secretion influenced the requirement for insulin therapy, but C-CPI could serve as the most convenient and useful biomarker for not only current insulin therapy requirements (p = 0.0002) but also the subsequent requirement for insulin therapy (p = 0.0008).

conclusionsC-CPI could be determined easily, and it was found to be a more practical marker for outpatients; therefore, our findings would have critical implications for primary care.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2C-PeptideFemaleHumansInsulinMaleOutpatientsPrimary Health CareC-PeptideInsulin2型糖尿病casual examinationC-peptide indexC肽指数type 2 diabetesurinary C-peptide/creatine ratio尿C肽/肌酸比值随机检查

Identifiers

PMID35229479
PMCPMC9060140
OpenAlexW4214770736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.