Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229320›Full record

ReviewInternational endodontic journal2022

Present status and future directions: Root resorption.

Shanon Patel, Navid Saberi, Tiago Pimental, Peng-Hui Teng

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International endodontic journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. External Cervical Resorption Treatment: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Cases Treated Over a 20-Year Period.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanon PatelFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-6951
Navid SaberiFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-4353
Tiago PimentalFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-5369
Peng-Hui TengFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-6565
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root resorption is the loss of dental hard tissue because of odontoclastic action. In permanent teeth, it is undesirable and pathological in nature. Root resorption may occur on the inner aspect of the root canal (internal root resorption) or on the outer aspect of the root (external root resorption). Regardless of its location, root resorption is irreversible, and may result in discomfort for the patient, requires management and/or, in some cases, results in the premature loss of the affected tooth. Root resorption is often challenging to accurately diagnose and manage. The aim of this narrative review is to present the relevant literature on the aetiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management, as well as discuss the future directions of diagnosis and management of root resorption.

Indexed as

Root ResorptionDentition, PermanentHumansRoot Canal Therapyexternal root resorptioninternal root resorption

Identifiers

PMID35229320
PMCPMC9790676
OpenAlexW4214567790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.