Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229294›Full record

ReviewJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2022

Clinical neuropharmacology of cocaine reinforcement: A narrative review of human laboratory self-administration studies.

Sean D Regnier, Joshua A Lile, Craig R Rush, William W Stoops

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean D RegnierDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Joshua A LileDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Craig R RushDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
William W StoopsDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-0160

Funding

Research Training in Drug Abuse BehaviorT32DA035200 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CRAIG R RUSH, William Walton Stoops · 2013 to 2026
$4.4M
A translational determination of the mechanisms of maladaptive choice in cocaine use disorderR01DA045023 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA, LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Influence of 5-HT1b Activation on the Abuse Related Effects of CocaineR01DA052203 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2021 to 2022
$1.3M
Influence of Orexin Antagonism on Motivation for CocaineR01DA048617 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2019 to 2020
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045023NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048617NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052203NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA035200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine use is an unrelenting public health concern. To inform intervention and prevention efforts, it is crucial to develop an understanding of the clinical neuropharmacology of the reinforcing effects of cocaine. The purpose of this review is to evaluate and synthesize human laboratory studies that assess pharmacological manipulations of cocaine self-administration. Forty-one peer-reviewed, human cocaine self-administration studies in which participants received a pretreatment drug were assessed. The pharmacological action and treatment regimen for all drugs reviewed were considered. Drugs that increase extracellular dopamine tend to have the most consistent effects on cocaine self-administration. The ability of nondopaminergic drugs to impact cocaine reinforcement might be related to their downstream effects on dopamine, though it is difficult to draw conclusions because pharmacologically selective compounds are not widely available for human testing. The ability of acute versus chronic drug treatment to differentially affect human cocaine self-administration was not determined because buprenorphine was the only pretreatment drug that was assessed under both acute and chronic dosing regimens. Future research directly comparing acute and chronic drug treatment and/or comparing drugs with different mechanisms of action, is needed to make more conclusive determinations about the clinical neuropharmacology of cocaine reinforcement.

Indexed as

CocaineDopamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansNeuropharmacologyReinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationCocaineDopaminecocainehumansneuropharmacologypretreatmentself-administration

Identifiers

PMID35229294
PMCPMC9090960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.