Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229253›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improved quality of life in female patients with fibromyalgia.

N Samartin-Veiga, A J González-Villar, M Pidal-Miranda, A Vázquez-Millán, M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Are OMERACT recommendations followed in clinical trials on fibromyalgia? A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes and their measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Therapeutic approach to fibromyalgia: a consensus statement on pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment from the neuropathic pain special interest group of the Italian neurological society.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

N Samartin-VeigaBrain and Pain (BaP) Lab, Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica y Psicobioloxía, Facultade de Psicoloxia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain. noelia.samartin.veiga@usc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-6744
A J González-VillarPsychological Neuroscience Lab, Research Center in Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-920X
M Pidal-MirandaBrain and Pain (BaP) Lab, Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica y Psicobioloxía, Facultade de Psicoloxia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-2913
A Vázquez-MillánBrain and Pain (BaP) Lab, Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica y Psicobioloxía, Facultade de Psicoloxia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7093-0575
M T Carrillo-de-la-PeñaBrain and Pain (BaP) Lab, Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica y Psicobioloxía, Facultade de Psicoloxia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6940-2460
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

ministerio de economía y competitividad BES-2017-082684ministerio de economía y competitividad PSI2016-75313-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain syndrome with a strong impact on quality of life (QoL). Treatment of this condition remains a challenge, due to the scarce evidence for the effectiveness of the therapeutic approaches available. Current attention is focused on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which has yielded promising results for pain treatment. Rather than focusing only on pain relief, in this study, we aimed to determine how active or sham tDCS (over three cortical targets -the primary motor cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the operculo-insular cortex-) affect QoL in patients with FM.

methodsUsing a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, we applied fifteen tDCS sessions of 20' to initial 130 participants (randomized to any of the four treatment groups). We evaluated the QoL (assessed by SF-36) and the symptoms' impact (assessed by FIQ-R) in baseline, after treatment and at 6 months follow-up.

resultsAll groups were comparable as regards age, medication pattern and severity of symptoms before the treatment. We found that QoL and symptoms' impact improved in all treatment groups (including the sham) and this improvement lasted for up to 6 months. However, we did not observe any group effect nor group*treatment interaction.

conclusionsAfter the intervention, we observed a non-specific effect that may be due to placebo, favoured by the expectations of tDCS efficacy and psychosocial variables inherent to the intervention (daily relationship with therapists and other patients in the clinic). Therefore, active tDCS is not superior to sham stimulation in improving QoL in FM.

Indexed as

Chronic PainFibromyalgiaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPain ManagementQuality of LifeFibromyalgiaFIQ-RQuality of life (QoL)Randomized controlled trial (RCT)SF-36Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID35229253
PMCPMC9250466
OpenAlexW4214622349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.