Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229242›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

Investigation of avian rotavirus infections in broiler chicks from commercial flocks with different performance efficiency indexes.

Jéssica Cristhine Gallego, Daniela Lorencena, Janaína Lustosa de Mello, Ruana Renostro Delai, Mônica Regina de Matos, Aline de Marco Viott, Elis Lorenzetti, Amauri Alcindo Alfieri, Sergio Rodrigo Fernandes, Elisabete Takiuchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Partial nucleotide sequence analysis of the VP6 gene from rotavirus species A, D, and F identified in diarrheic broiler chickens.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jéssica Cristhine GallegoDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-0872
Daniela LorencenaDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-5590
Janaína Lustosa de MelloDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-6483
Ruana Renostro DelaiDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-8336
Mônica Regina de MatosDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-8468
Aline de Marco ViottDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-2359
Elis LorenzettiDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL, Londrina, PR, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5032-712X
Amauri Alcindo AlfieriDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL, Londrina, PR, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7024-4487
Sergio Rodrigo FernandesDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL, Londrina, PR, 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-1616
Elisabete TakiuchiDepartamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR, Palotina, PR, 85950-000, Brazil. e.takiuchi@ufpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-2143
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the frequency of occurrence of avian rotavirus (AvRV) in poultry flocks according to its Performance Efficiency Index (PEI) scores. A total of 256 individual intestinal content samples of small sized-chicks (runts) with clinical signs of Runting Stunting Syndrome (RSS) and 24 clinically healthy chicks (control) were collected from twelve flocks in southern Brazil with different PEI scores: good (n = 4, PEI mean = 365); moderate (n = 4, PEI mean = 342) or poor (n = 4, PEI mean = 319). Silver-stained polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (ss-PAGE) was used to detect and identify the AvRV species followed by RT-PCR and sequencing of the partial VP6 gene for species confirmation. AvRV was detected in 83% (10/12) of the flocks and 23.4% (60/256) of the chicks. The electrophoretic migration patterns of viral dsRNA segments were compatible with AvRV species A (AvRV- A), D (AvRV-D) and F (AvRV-F) in 9 (15%), 18 (30%), and 33 (55%) of the positive chicks fecal samples, respectively. The AvRV species identified by ss-PAGE were confirmed by RT-PCR and partial sequence analysis of the VP6 gene. The AvRV detection rate was statistically higher (p = 0.007) in chicks from flocks with poor PEI when compared to those with good PEI. The occurrence of AvRV-D and AvRV-F was statistically higher in 7 to 9 days old chicks, while AvRV-A was detected only in 13 to 14 days old animals.

Indexed as

Poultry DiseasesRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsAnimalsChickensFecesPoultry flocksRotavirus ARotavirus DRotavirus FRunting stunting syndromeSs-PAGE

Identifiers

PMID35229242
PMCPMC8885118
OpenAlexW4214520610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.