Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229179›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Repeatability and learning effect in the 6MWT in preoperative cancer patients undergoing a prehabilitation program.

Raquel Sebio-Garcia, Fernando Dana, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Manuel López-Baamonde, Marta Ubré, Mar Montané-Muntané, Raquel Risco, Monique Messagi-Sartor, Josep Roca, Graciela Martínez-Palli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effectiveness of message framing on pulmonary rehabilitation behavior for lung cancer surgery patients: Randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raquel Sebio-GarciaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 06036, Barcelona, Spain. sebio@clinic.cat.
Fernando DanaPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena Gimeno-SantosPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 06036, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel López-BaamondePrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta UbréPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mar Montané-MuntanéPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel RiscoPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Monique Messagi-SartorPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep RocaIDIBAPS (Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Graciela Martínez-PalliPrehabilitation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/00852Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/04255Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/00841Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe main objective was to assess repeatability and learning effect of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in a cohort of preoperative cancer patients referred to a prehabilitation program. As a secondary objective, we aimed to identify determinants of improvement in the second test. MATERIALS AND

methodsSecondary analysis from a large prospective study on the implementation of a multimodal prehabilitation program in a real-life scenario. Eligible patients were assessed at baseline before starting the prehabilitation program. The 6MWT was conducted according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines with two tests being performed under identical conditions separated by 30 min. The distance covered (in meters) and the physiological responses (heart rate, oxygen saturation, fatigue, and dyspnea) to each test were recorded and compared.

resultsA total of 170 patients (60.9%) were analyzed. Repeatability of the distance covered with the 6MWT was excellent (ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99), but a mean increase of + 19.5 m (95% CI: 15.6-23.5 m; p =  < .001) in the second test was found, showing a learning effect with limits of agreement between - 31.3 and 70.4 m. Coefficient of variation was 4%. No clinical factor was found to be associated with an improvement in the second test.

conclusionsThe 6MWT showed excellent repeatability in preoperative cancer patients, but a significant learning effect is present. No associated factors with a clinically meaningful improvement in the second test were identified. In light of these findings, two attempts of the 6MWT should be encouraged in this population.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseHeart RateHumansProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationCancerPrehabilitationRepeatabilitySix-minute walk test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.