Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229055›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2022

Revival of the heterologous prime-boost technique in COVID-19: An outlook from the history of outbreaks.

Amna Siddiqui, Alishba Adnan, Munib Abbas, Shafaq Taseen, Sidhant Ochani, Mohammad Yasir Essar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Results and Policy Implications of a COVID-19 Vaccine Post-introduction Evaluation in Thailand, May 2022.Outbreak, surveillance, investigation & response (OSIR) journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social and Policy Determinants of COVID-19.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amna SiddiquiDepartment of MBBS Karachi Medical and Dental College Karachi City Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-0362
Alishba AdnanDepartment of MBBS Karachi Medical and Dental College Karachi City Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-6687
Munib AbbasDepartment of MBBS Karachi Medical and Dental College Karachi City Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-7036
Shafaq TaseenDepartment of MBBS Karachi Medical and Dental College Karachi City Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-3679
Sidhant OchaniDepartment of MBBS Khairpur Medical College Khairpur Mir's Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2079-148X
Mohammad Yasir EssarDepartment of MBBS Kabul University of Medical Sciences Kabul Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6554-7619
Karachi Medical and Dental College · PKKabul University · AFShah Abdul Latif University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe heterologous prime-boost vaccination technique is not novel as it has a history of deployment in previous outbreaks.

aimHence, this narrative review aims to provide critical insight for reviving the heterologous prime-boost immunization strategy for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination relative to a brief positive outlook on the mix-dose approach deployed in previous and existing outbreaks (ie, Ebola virus disease (EVD), malaria, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, HIV and influenza virus). METHODOLOGY AND MATERIALS: A Boolean search was carried out to find the literature in MEDLINE-PubMed, Clinicaltrials, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up till December 22, 2021, using the specific keywords that include "SARS-CoV2", "COVID-19", "Ebola," "Malaria," "Tuberculosis," "Human Immunodeficiency Virus," "Hepatitis B," "Influenza," "Mix and match," "Heterologous prime-boost," with interposition of "OR" and "AND." Full text of all the related articles in English language with supplementary appendix was retrieved. In addition, the full text of relevant cross-references was also retrieved.

resultsTherefore, as generally evident by the primary outcomes, that is, safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity reported and updated by preclinical and clinical studies for addressing previous and existing outbreaks so far, including COVID-19, it is understood that heterologous prime-boost immunization has been proven successful for eliciting a more efficacious immune response as of yet in comparison to the traditional homologous prime-boost immunization regimen. DISCUSSION: Accordingly, with increasing cases of COVID-19, many countries such as Germany, Pakistan, Canada, Thailand, and the United Kingdom have started administering the heterologous vaccination as the technique aids to rationalize the usage of the available vaccines to aid in the global race to vaccinate majority to curb the spread of COVID-19 efficiently. However, the article emphasizes the need for more large controlled trials considering demographic details of vaccine recipients, which would play an essential role in clearing the mistrust about safety concerns to pace up the acceptance of the technique across the globe.

conclusionConsequently, by combatting the back-to-back waves of COVID-19 and other challenging variants of concerns, including Omicron, the discussed approach can also help in addressing the expected evolution of priority outbreaks as coined by WHO, that is, "Disease X" in 2018 with competency, which according to WHO can turn into the "next pandemic" or the "next public health emergency," thus would eventually lead to eradicating the risk of "population crisis."

Indexed as

COVID‐19 vaccinesEbolahepatitis Bheterologous prime‐boost techniqueHIVinfluenza virusmalariaMix and Match approachoutbreakstuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35229055
PMCPMC8866911
OpenAlexW4213415368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.