Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229042›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: The consequences for patients and healthcare systems, a healthcare professional survey.

Sophie Clare Laura Caseby, Fern Amy Woodhouse, Stephen Maxwell Montgomery, Michel Anton Kroes, Martin Edward Duddy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of risk of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie Clare Laura CasebyMarket Access Division Costello Medical London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-500X
Fern Amy WoodhouseHTA Division Costello Medical Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-840X
Stephen Maxwell MontgomeryHTA Division Costello Medical Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8481-5850
Michel Anton KroesHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited London UK.
Martin Edward DuddyDepartment of Neurology Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-8977
Costello Medical Consulting (United Kingdom) · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNovartis (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTransition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) from relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) is an expected part of the disease trajectory for most patients. However, the transition is challenging to identify due to the gradual nature of progression, and the complications of superimposed relapses, comorbidities, and natural variability in symptoms. This healthcare professional (HCP) survey sought to characterize the transition to and management of SPMS in UK clinical practice.

methodsTelephone interviews with 20 neurologists and MS specialist nurses from England and Scotland gathered quantitative and qualitative responses. Numerical analyses and theoretical thematic methods were used to identify key emerging themes.

resultsThe burden SPMS imposes on patients and caregivers was a major theme; discharge from specialist services is common, leading to a sense of abandonment. Respondents acknowledged substantial hesitancy toward identifying SPMS, predominantly due to restricted options of licensed and reimbursed disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for SPMS compared with RRMS. Currently, HCPs continue DMTs under a label of RRMS, even after recognition of progression. This survey identified MS to be unusual in comparison with other disease areas in that reimbursement guidelines have a direct impact on clinicians' decisions around disease staging. Respondents suggested reimbursed DMTs proven to slow disability progression in SPMS will create a step-change in identifying SPMS, providing rationale to acknowledge progression earlier while removing key obstacles to identification. To aid this change, respondents identified a need for SPMS-specific diagnostic guidance, despite substantial divergence in implementation of current guidance.

conclusionsIn contrast to the current heterogeneity, a more structured and standardized approach to the identification of SPMS, along with guidelines on treatment, will ensure patients can maximally benefit as treatment options for SPMS evolve.

Indexed as

disease‐modifying therapiesmultiple sclerosisprogressivequality of lifesymptomatic treatment

Identifiers

PMID35229042
PMCPMC8865068
OpenAlexW4206951744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.