Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229023›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults.

Daria Antonenko, Friederike Thams, Ulrike Grittner, Jessica Uhrich, Franka Glöckner, Shu-Chen Li, Agnes Flöel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05929872 (The Efficacy of Strategic Memory Training Coupled With Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques in Healthy Aging Population and Subjective Cognitive Decline Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05929872 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Strategic Memory Training Coupled With Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques in Healthy Aging Population and Subjective Cognitive Decline Patients: a Randomized-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationRan2023 to 2026Enrolled56ConditionsCognitive Decline, Healthy AgingArmsNon-invasive brain stimulation, Sham non-invasive brain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Alzheimer Combination Therapies: Overview and Scenarios.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daria AntonenkoDepartment of Neurology Universitätsmedizin Greifswald Greifswald Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-4609
Friederike ThamsDepartment of Neurology Universitätsmedizin Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Ulrike GrittnerBerlin Institute of Health (BIH) Berlin Germany.
Jessica UhrichDepartment of Neurology Universitätsmedizin Greifswald Greifswald Germany.
Franka GlöcknerLifespan Developmental Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology TU Dresden Dresden Germany.
Shu-Chen LiLifespan Developmental Neuroscience Faculty of Psychology TU Dresden Dresden Germany.
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology Universitätsmedizin Greifswald Greifswald Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-5872
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven rapid global population aging, developing interventions against age-associated cognitive decline is an important medical and societal goal. We evaluated a cognitive training protocol combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on trained and non-trained functions in non-demented older adults.

methodsFifty-six older adults (65-80 years) were randomly assigned to one of two interventional groups, using age and baseline performance as strata. Both groups performed a nine-session cognitive training over 3 weeks with either concurrent anodal tDCS (atDCS, 1 mA, 20 minutes) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (target intervention) or sham stimulation (control intervention). Primary outcome was performance on the trained letter updating task immediately after training. Secondary outcomes included performance on other executive and memory (near and far transfer) tasks. All tasks were administered at baseline, post-intervention, and at 1- and 7-month follow-up assessments. Prespecified analyses to investigate treatment effects were conducted using mixed-model analyses.

resultsNo between-group differences emerged in the trained letter updating and Markov decision-making tasks at post-intervention and at follow-up timepoints. Secondary analyses revealed group differences in one near-transfer task: Superior n-back task performance was observed in the tDCS group at post-intervention and at follow-up. No such effects were observed for the other transfer tasks. Improvements in working memory were associated with individually induced electric field strengths. DISCUSSION: Cognitive training with atDCS did not lead to superior improvement in trained task performance compared to cognitive training with sham stimulation. Thus, our results do not support the immediate benefit of tDCS-assisted multi-session cognitive training on the trained function. As the intervention enhanced performance in a near-transfer working memory task, we provide exploratory evidence for effects on non-trained working memory functions in non-demented older adults that persist over a period of 1 month.

Indexed as

cognitive interventioncomputational modelingelectric fieldsexecutive functionshealthy agingmemorynon‐invasive brain stimulationtranscranial electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35229023
PMCPMC8864498
OpenAlexW4213341843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.