Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229021›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

Bioinformatics pipeline to guide late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) post-GWAS studies: Prioritizing transcription regulatory variants within LOAD-associated regions.

Michael W Lutz, Ornit Chiba-Falek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael W LutzDivision of Translational Brain Sciences Department of Neurology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA.
Ornit Chiba-FalekDivision of Translational Brain Sciences Department of Neurology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA.

Funding

Deciphering the regulation of gene expression in the etiology of LOADR01AG057522 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHIBA-FALEK, ORNIT, LUTZ, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs new late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) genetic risk loci are identified and brain cell-type specific omics data becomes available, there is an unmet need for a bioinformatics framework to prioritize genes and variants for testing in single-cell molecular profiling experiments and validation using disease models and gene editing technologies. Prior work has characterized and prioritized active enhancers located in LOAD-genome-wide association study (GWAS) regions and their potential interactions with candidate genes. The current study extends this work by focusing on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within these LOAD enhancers and their impact on altering transcription factor (TF) binding. The proposed bioinformatics pipeline progresses from SNPs located in LOAD-GWAS regions to a filtered set of candidate regulatory SNPs that have a predicted strong effect on TF binding.

methodsActive enhancers within LOAD-associated regions were identified and SNPs located in the enhancers were catalogued. SNPs that disrupt TF binding sites were prioritized and the respective TFs were filtered to include only those that were expressed in brain tissues relevant to LOAD. The TFs binding to the corresponding sequence was further confirmed by ChIP-seq signals. Finally, the high-priority candidate SNPs were evaluated as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in disease-relevant tissues.

resultsWe catalogued 61 strong enhancers in LOAD-GWAS regions encompassing 326 SNPs and 104 TF binding sites. Seventy-seven and 78 of the TFs were expressed in brain and monocytes, respectively, out of which 19 TF-binding sites showed ChIP-seq signals. Eleven SNPs were found to interrupt with TF binding out of which three SNPs were also significant eQTL. DISCUSSION: This study provides a framework to catalogue noncoding variations in enhancers located in LOAD-GWAS loci and characterize their likelihood to perturb TF binding. The approach integrates multiple data types to characterize and prioritize SNPs for putative regulatory function using single-cell multi-omics assays and gene editing.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's disease geneticsexpression analysisgenetic variant annotation and prioritizationtranscription factor binding analysis

Identifiers

PMID35229021
PMCPMC8864953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.