Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35229018›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Automated semantic relevance as an indicator of cognitive decline: Out-of-sample validation on a large-scale longitudinal dataset.

Gabriela Stegmann, Shira Hahn, Samarth Bhandari, Kan Kawabata, Jeremy Shefner, Cayla Jessica Duncan, Julie Liss, Visar Berisha, Kimberly Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An End-to-End Overview of Clinical Speech AI.IEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing (2025) · 2026
    Article
  3. Development of language composites for enhanced sensitivity to multiple plasma biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriela StegmannArizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.
Shira HahnArizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.
Samarth BhandariAural Analytics Scottsdale Arizona USA.
Kan KawabataAural Analytics Scottsdale Arizona USA.
Jeremy ShefnerBarrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA.
Cayla Jessica DuncanBarrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA.
Julie LissArizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.
Visar BerishaArizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA.
Kimberly MuellerWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
African Americans Fighting Alzheimer’s in Midlife (AA-FAIM)R01AG054059 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAREY E GLEASON · 2016 to 2026
$15.3M
Perception of dysarthric speech: An objective model of dysarthric speech evaluation with actionable outcomesR01DC006859 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BERISHA, VISAR, LISS, JULIE M · 2004 to 2021
$4.8M
Novel Story Recall Measures as Indicators of Cognitive Decline Associated with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Biomarkers: A Collaborative Study of Existing DataR01AG070940 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Kimberly D Mueller · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054059NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070940NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and evaluated an automatically extracted measure of cognition (semantic relevance) using automated and manual transcripts of audio recordings from healthy and cognitively impaired participants describing the Cookie Theft picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. We describe the rationale and metric validation. We developed the measure on one dataset and evaluated it on a large database (>2000 samples) by comparing accuracy against a manually calculated metric and evaluating its clinical relevance. The fully automated measure was accurate (r = .84), had moderate to good reliability (intra-class correlation = .73), correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and improved the fit in the context of other automatic language features (r = .65), and longitudinally declined with age and level of cognitive impairment. This study demonstrates the use of a rigorous analytical and clinical framework for validating automatic measures of speech, and applied it to a measure that is accurate and clinically relevant.

Indexed as

algorithmautomaticcognitiondigitallanguagelongitudinalspeech

Identifiers

PMID35229018
PMCPMC8865737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.