Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228995›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2022

HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment - A prospective randomized and multicenter study.

Zheng Li, Xin Chen, Xiaoquan Wang, Bo Zhang, Wei Wang, Yu Fan, Jun Yan, Xiaofeng Zhang, Yu Zhao, Yuan Lin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Continuous outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty trials are statistically fragile.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. [A multicenter randomized controlled trial of domestic robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Research progress of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee from perspective of precision medicine].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoquan WangDepartment of Joint Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, PR China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8th Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang, Beijing, 100020, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu FanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jun YanBEIJING HURWA-ROBOT Medical Technology Co.Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng ZhangBEIJING HURWA-ROBOT Medical Technology Co.Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhaoBEIJING HURWA-ROBOT Medical Technology Co.Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yuan LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8th Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang, Beijing, 100020, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Joint Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, PR China.
Jin LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNWuhu Hit Robot Technology Research Institute · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNTianjin Hospital · CNBeijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to those of conventional TKA.

methodsA total of 150 patients were randomized into two groups - 73 and 77 patients underwent robotic-assisted TKA and conventional TKA, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were obtained and compared between these two groups. The preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and the rate of HKA≤3° in the two groups were also compared.

resultsThe postoperative mean HKA angle was 1.801° ​± ​1.608° of varus for the robotic-assisted TKA group and 3.017° ​± ​2.735° of varus for the conventional TKA group; these values were significantly different. The alignment rate for mechanical axis lower than 3° in the robotic-assisted TKA group and the conventional TKA group were 81.2% and 63.5%, respectively. Patients undergone robotic-assisted TKA or conventional TKA had similarly improved knee flexion and functional recovery reflected by WOMAC score, HSS score, SF-36 score and KSS.

conclusionHURWA robotic-assisted TKA is a safe and effective, resulting in better alignment for mechanical axis than conventional TKA. The improvement in knee flexion and functional recovery after HURWA robotic-assisted TKA were similar to those after conventional TKA. However, longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the improved alignment of mechanical axis will produce better long-term clinical outcomes. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Recently, the robotic-assisted TKA system has been introduced to clinical practice for TKA. Several robotic-assisted TKA systems, including CASPAR, Tsolution, ROSA, ROBODOC and Mako, have been implemented into clinical application.However, the clinical application of these robotic systems was limited due to their technical complexity, insufficient versatility and increased operative time. Until now, there are still no robotic-assisted TKA systems approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China. Therefore, more robotic-assisted TKA systems need to be designed and improved, particularly in China. Through our randomized, multicenter, single blind and parallel controlled trial, we showed that HURWA robot-assisted TKA system is a safe and effective system for TKA, which had improved knee flexion.

Indexed as

KOA, Knee osteoarthritisOsteoarthritisTKATKA, total knee arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35228995
PMCPMC8857449
OpenAlexW4212841791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.