Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228964›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Retrospective Review of the Natural Progression of Cardiac Vegetation.

Mehakmeet Bhatia, Saleha Asghar, Roomana Khan, Vivek Kak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehakmeet BhatiaInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Jackson, USA.
Saleha AsgharInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Jackson, USA.
Roomana KhanInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Jackson, USA.
Vivek KakInfectious Disease, Henry Ford Allegiance Health, Jackson, USA.
Henry Ford Allegiance Health · USHenry Ford Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition with an annual mortality of up to 40%. Vegetations are the hallmark of IE, however, factors that affect the initial size and changes in size remain unclear. Our study aims to investigate the natural history of cardiac vegetation, including changes in size and/or resolution with adequate treatment, and to analyze factors that influence size and potential for persistence. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 102 patients admitted with native-valve endocarditis at Henry Ford Health System from September 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019. We included patients treated with six weeks of intravenous antibiotics who had both a diagnostic and a follow-up echocardiogram after antibiotic completion. The primary outcome was the change in vegetation size. Secondary measures included pathogen identification, valve involvement, number of complications, associated IV drug use, and co-infection with hepatitis B/C.

resultsOf the 102 patients reviewed, 30 patients matched the inclusion criteria. There was a significant decrease in vegetation size after adequate antibiotic treatment. However, complete resolution was not often seen. A statistically significant relationship was seen between vegetation size, IV drug use, and Staphylococcal species (including both methicillin-susceptible

conclusionLarge vegetation may predict a higher risk of embolic complications and can be reduced with IV antibiotics, although complete resolution is not likely. IV drug use and Staphylococcal endocarditis influence vegetation size and embolic complications. We argue that these subgroups should be prioritized for early surgical intervention.

Indexed as

emboliinfective endocarditisiv drug usestaphylococcus aureus endocarditisvegetation size

Identifiers

PMID35228964
PMCPMC8870985
OpenAlexW4207082561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.