ArticleCureus2022
A Retrospective Review of the Natural Progression of Cardiac Vegetation.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gerbode defect resulting from ineffective treatment of infective endocarditis: a case report.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2025Article
- Vegetation Length is Associated with Long-term Survival in Patients Treated Surgically for Infective Endocarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- From flank pain to splenic abscess: a complex case of infective endocarditis with literature review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition with an annual mortality of up to 40%. Vegetations are the hallmark of IE, however, factors that affect the initial size and changes in size remain unclear. Our study aims to investigate the natural history of cardiac vegetation, including changes in size and/or resolution with adequate treatment, and to analyze factors that influence size and potential for persistence. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 102 patients admitted with native-valve endocarditis at Henry Ford Health System from September 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019. We included patients treated with six weeks of intravenous antibiotics who had both a diagnostic and a follow-up echocardiogram after antibiotic completion. The primary outcome was the change in vegetation size. Secondary measures included pathogen identification, valve involvement, number of complications, associated IV drug use, and co-infection with hepatitis B/C.
resultsOf the 102 patients reviewed, 30 patients matched the inclusion criteria. There was a significant decrease in vegetation size after adequate antibiotic treatment. However, complete resolution was not often seen. A statistically significant relationship was seen between vegetation size, IV drug use, and Staphylococcal species (including both methicillin-susceptible
conclusionLarge vegetation may predict a higher risk of embolic complications and can be reduced with IV antibiotics, although complete resolution is not likely. IV drug use and Staphylococcal endocarditis influence vegetation size and embolic complications. We argue that these subgroups should be prioritized for early surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.