Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228893›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

Effectiveness of Pedagogical Tools for Teaching Medical Gross Anatomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dustin C Lin, Bailey Bunch, Raissa Zuim Dantas De Souza, Dickson Chen, Jinyan Zhou, Ann C Zumwalt, Jonathan J Wisco

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dustin C Lin *Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-8056
Bailey Bunch *Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Raissa Zuim Dantas De SouzaDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Dickson ChenDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Jinyan ZhouDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Ann C ZumwaltDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Jonathan J WiscoDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118 USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical institutions have been forced to modify gross anatomy pedagogy to comply with the health restrictions imposed by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) is one such institution that temporarily restructured its course. We replaced cadaveric dissection activities with prosections and placed a greater emphasis on a flipped classroom model. This study investigates the effectiveness of new course materials developed to aid these curriculum changes. Course materials were developed for three purposes: (1) preparation before laboratory sessions (orientation videos and Complete Anatomy (3D4Medical, Elsevier) screens); (2) guidance during laboratory sessions (laboratory guides); and (3) review after laboratory sessions (Zoom recitation sessions). We performed a grounded theory thematic analysis of students' responses (80/160, 50% response) to qualitative survey questions and to focus group questions (16 students who self-selected between 4 different sessions). Data from both the survey and focus groups demonstrated that the vast majority of students agreed that the materials helped them navigate through learning gross anatomy. However, laboratory guides were used mostly for post-lab review as opposed to the intended direction during laboratory sessions. Students within all focus groups overwhelmingly touted the value of Zoom recitation sessions, with many stating that they were imperative to course success. When comparing performance data between 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 students, we found that the students who took the anatomy course during the onset of COVID had a slightly higher overall average score in all three modules of the course than compared to the 2019 students. We propose that the utilization of course materials that students perceived as time saving and pertinent to their exam performance, when combined with cadaveric prosection, emphasized the benefits of flipped-classroom learning to help students learn gross anatomy effectively and efficiently during the pandemic and beyond. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01524-x.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicFlipped classroomGross anatomy educationMedical educationOnline teaching

Identifiers

PMID35228893
PMCPMC8866923
OpenAlexW4213439835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.