Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228820›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2022

Using Machine Learning to Identify Patients at High Risk of Inappropriate Drug Dosing in Periods with Renal Dysfunction.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Cristina Leal Rodríguez, Davide Placido, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Anna Pors Nielsen, Nicolas Dérian, Søren Brunak, Stig Ejdrup Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-HansenClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-0371
Cristina Leal RodríguezNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3133-0630
Davide PlacidoNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8327-8838
Hans-Christian Thorsen-MeyerNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7002-3089
Anna Pors NielsenNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7903-5051
Nicolas DérianData and Development Support, Region Zealand, Sorø, Denmark.
Søren BrunakNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig Ejdrup AndersenClinical Pharmacology Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKRegion Zealand · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDosing of renally cleared drugs in patients with kidney failure often deviates from clinical guidelines, so we sought to elicit predictors of receiving inappropriate doses of renal risk drugs. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe combined data from the Danish National Patient Register and in-hospital data on drug administrations and estimated glomerular filtration rates for admissions between 1 October 2009 and 1 June 2016, from a pool of about 2.6 million persons. We trained artificial neural network and linear logistic ridge regression models to predict the risk of five outcomes (>0, ≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥5 inappropriate doses daily) with index set 24 hours after admission. We used time-series validation for evaluating discrimination, calibration, clinical utility and explanations.

resultsOf 52,451 admissions included, 42,250 (81%) were used for model development. The median age was 77 years; 50% of admissions were of women. ≥5 drugs were used between admission start and index in 23,124 admissions (44%); the most common drug classes were analgesics, systemic antibacterials, diuretics, antithrombotics, and antacids. The neural network models had better discriminative power (all AUROCs between 0.77 and 0.81) and were better calibrated than their linear counterparts. The main prediction drivers were use of anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and anti-Parkinson's drugs as well as having a diagnosis of chronic kidney failure. Sex and age affected predictions but slightly.

conclusionOur models can flag patients at high risk of receiving at least one inappropriate dose daily in a controlled in-silico setting. A prospective clinical study may confirm that this holds in real-life settings and translates into benefits in hard endpoints.

Indexed as

inappropriate drug dosingkidney failuremachine learningpredictive modellingrenal risk drugsrisk markers

Identifiers

PMID35228820
PMCPMC8881932
OpenAlexW4212960334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.