Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228769›Full record

ReviewThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2022

A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing.

Rahul Davis, Abhishek Singh, Mark James Jackson, Reginaldo Teixeira Coelho, Divya Prakash, Charalambos Panayiotou Charalambous, Waqar Ahmed, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da Silva, Abner Ankit Lawrence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Three-Dimensional Titanium Substrates with Anodic TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rahul DavisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, 800005 India.
Abhishek SinghDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, 800005 India.
Mark James JacksonSchool of Integrated Studies, College of Technology and Aviation, Kansas State University, Salina, KS 67401 USA.
Reginaldo Teixeira CoelhoSchool of Engineering at São Carlos, The University of São Paulo, São Carlos, 13566-590 Brazil.
Divya PrakashDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007 India.
Charalambos Panayiotou CharalambousSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Waqar AhmedSchool of Mathematics and Physics, College of Science, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK.
Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da SilvaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. João Naves de Ávila, Uberlândia, MG 38400-902 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-4500
Abner Ankit LawrenceDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a tremendous increase in the demand for converting biomaterials into high-quality industrially manufactured human body parts, also known as medical implants. Drug delivery systems, bone plates, screws, cranial, and dental devices are the popular examples of these implants - the potential alternatives for human life survival. However, the processing techniques of an engineered implant largely determine its preciseness, surface characteristics, and interactive ability with the adjacent tissue(s) in a particular biological environment. Moreover, the high cost-effective manufacturing of an implant under tight tolerances remains a challenge. In this regard, several subtractive or additive manufacturing techniques are employed to manufacture patient-specific implants, depending primarily on the required biocompatibility, bioactivity, surface integrity, and fatigue strength. The present paper reviews numerous non-degradable and degradable metallic implant biomaterials such as stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti)-based, cobalt (Co)-based, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and magnesium (Mg)-based alloys, followed by their processing via traditional turning, drilling, and milling including the high-speed multi-axis CNC machining, and non-traditional  abrasive water jet machining (AWJM), laser beam machining (LBM), ultrasonic machining (USM), and electric discharge machining (EDM) types of subtractive manufacturing techniques. However, the review further funnels down its primary focus on Mg, NiTi, and Ti-based alloys on the basis of the increasing trend of their implant applications in the last decade due to some of their outstanding properties. In the recent years, the incorporation of cryogenic coolant-assisted traditional subtraction of biomaterials has gained researchers' attention due to its sustainability, environment-friendly nature, performance, and superior biocompatible and functional outcomes fitting for medical applications. However, some of the latest studies reported that the medical implant manufacturing requirements could be more remarkably met using the non-traditional subtractive manufacturing approaches. Altogether, cryogenic  machining among the traditional routes and EDM among the non-traditional means along with their variants, were identified as some of the most effective subtractive manufacturing techniques for achieving the dimensionally accurate and biocompatible metallic medical implants with significantly modified surfaces.

Indexed as

BiocompatibilityCryogenic MachiningElectric discharge machiningMetallic implant biomaterialsSubtractive manufacturingTraditional and non-traditional machining

Identifiers

PMID35228769
PMCPMC8865884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.