ReviewThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2022
A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing.
Review in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Titanium Substrates with Anodic TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Accuracy of CBCT and dental-MRI for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single titanium implants: an in-vitro pilot study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Metal Alloys Used in Dental Prosthetics and Their Impact on the Oral Microbiome: Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Article
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Enhancing Poly-ε-Caprolactone Implant Performance: Synergistic Surface Modifications With Osteon-Like Microstructure, Cold Atmospheric Plasma, and Extracellular Matrix Coating.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Bone Healing Around Implants in Normal and Medically Compromised Conditions: Osteoporosis and Diabetes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Foot and ankle biomaterials: a comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Advancing Scoliosis Treatment with Patient-Specific Functionally Graded NiTi-SMA Rods: Key Considerations and Development Objectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Two-Peg Cementless Trabecular Metal Modular Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Study with Cemented Counterparts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Development of a Non-Contact Flow Sensor Based on a Permanent Magnet Metal Clip for Monitoring Circulation Status.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Role of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in arthroplasty and orthopaedics: a review of biomechanical properties, surface modifications, and clinical outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Review
- Effect of powder particle concentration, pulse duration, and pulse current on machined surface characterization produced via EDM of biocompatible WE-43Mg alloy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bionanomaterials or Nanobiomaterials: Differences in Definitions and Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Alloy Selection and Manufacturing Technologies for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Use of Non-Degradable Polymer (Polyetheretherketone) in Personalized Orthopedics-Review Article.Polymers · 2025Review
- Review
- Feasibility Study of Bioactive Hydrogel Coatings on Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Evaluating Biocompatibility: From Classical Techniques to State-of-the-Art Functional Proteomics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bioabsorbable implants are a viable alternative to traditional metallic implants in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a tremendous increase in the demand for converting biomaterials into high-quality industrially manufactured human body parts, also known as medical implants. Drug delivery systems, bone plates, screws, cranial, and dental devices are the popular examples of these implants - the potential alternatives for human life survival. However, the processing techniques of an engineered implant largely determine its preciseness, surface characteristics, and interactive ability with the adjacent tissue(s) in a particular biological environment. Moreover, the high cost-effective manufacturing of an implant under tight tolerances remains a challenge. In this regard, several subtractive or additive manufacturing techniques are employed to manufacture patient-specific implants, depending primarily on the required biocompatibility, bioactivity, surface integrity, and fatigue strength. The present paper reviews numerous non-degradable and degradable metallic implant biomaterials such as stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti)-based, cobalt (Co)-based, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and magnesium (Mg)-based alloys, followed by their processing via traditional turning, drilling, and milling including the high-speed multi-axis CNC machining, and non-traditional abrasive water jet machining (AWJM), laser beam machining (LBM), ultrasonic machining (USM), and electric discharge machining (EDM) types of subtractive manufacturing techniques. However, the review further funnels down its primary focus on Mg, NiTi, and Ti-based alloys on the basis of the increasing trend of their implant applications in the last decade due to some of their outstanding properties. In the recent years, the incorporation of cryogenic coolant-assisted traditional subtraction of biomaterials has gained researchers' attention due to its sustainability, environment-friendly nature, performance, and superior biocompatible and functional outcomes fitting for medical applications. However, some of the latest studies reported that the medical implant manufacturing requirements could be more remarkably met using the non-traditional subtractive manufacturing approaches. Altogether, cryogenic machining among the traditional routes and EDM among the non-traditional means along with their variants, were identified as some of the most effective subtractive manufacturing techniques for achieving the dimensionally accurate and biocompatible metallic medical implants with significantly modified surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.