Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228575›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Efficacy of escitalopram for poststroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rong-Fang Feng, Rui Ma, Peng Wang, Xu Ji, Zhen-Xiang Zhang, Meng-Meng Li, Jia-Wei Jiao, Li Guo

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Immunologic Underpinnings of Post-Stroke Depression.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rong-Fang FengThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Rui MaCollege of Physical Education (Based School), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Peng WangDepartment of Basic Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China. upliz@zzu.edu.cn.
Xu JiHenan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450046, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Xiang ZhangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Meng-Meng LiZhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450007, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Wei JiaoDepartment of Basic Medicine, School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Li GuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China. guoli5166@126.com.
Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNZhengzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is very common after stroke, causing multiple sequelae. We aimed to explore the efficacy of escitalopram for poststroke depression (PSD). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials. gov, Wan fang Data (Chinese), VIP (Chinese) and CNKI (Chinese) were retrieved from inception to May 2021. We recruited Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) which met the inclusion criteria in our study. The depression rating scores, the incidence of PSD, adverse events as well as functional outcomes were analyzed. 11 studies and 1374 participants were recruited in our work. The results were depicted: the reduction of depression rating scores was significant in the escitalopram groups and the standard mean difference (SMD) was - 1.25 (P < 0.001), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), - 1.82 to - 0.68; the risk ratio (RR) of the incidence of PSD was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.91; P = 0.007 < 0.05), which was significantly lower in the escitalopram groups; Escitalopram is safe for stroke patients; there was improvement of the motor function. However, in sensitivity analyses, the conclusions of the motor function and the incidence of drowsiness were altered. The study suggests that escitalopram has a potentially effective role compared with control groups and demonstrates escitalopram is safe. However, the results of the motor function and the incidence of drowsiness should be considered carefully and remain to be discussed in the future.

Indexed as

EscitalopramStrokeDepressionHumansIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEscitalopram

Identifiers

PMID35228575
PMCPMC8885641
OpenAlexW4214811464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.